SU‐GG‐BRC‐05: The Role of Hypoxia in Radiation Treatment Planning. A Simulation Study

M. Axente, P. Lin, A. Pugachev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the importance of hypoxia imaging for radiation treatment planning by evaluation of the effectiveness of modulated radiation treatments targeting hypoxia with increased doses. Method and Materials: Starting with a two‐dimensional diffusion model of tissue oxygenation, a planar tumor model was developed to simulate chronic and acute hypoxia as well as oxygenation/reoxygenation effects on the microscopic scale. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. Cell repopulation/tumor shrinkage was not considered, as to represent a slow‐growing tumor. Using this model, we evaluated the effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments targeting hypoxia with increased radiation doses. We compared different approaches to targeting hypoxia, including fixed dose modulation based on the pre‐treatment imaging of hypoxia and adaptive dose modulation based on interfraction imaging of hypoxia. Furthermore, to study the importance of hypoxia imaging resolution we compared two scenarios: 1. microscopic, where cell‐by‐cell imaging of hypoxia and dose delivery is possible, 2. macroscopic, where both imaging and irradiation can be conducted with 1mm resolution. Results: For a total tumor dose of 30Gy, the adaptive hypoxia‐targeting therapy provided the best tumor control for the microscopic scenario with [formula omitted] compared to [formula omitted] for the treatment with uniform dose of 2Gy per fraction. However, for a more realistic macroscopic scenario, the finite resolution of hypoxia imaging and dose delivery significantly reduced the therapeutic advantage of adaptive hypoxia targeted therapy resulting in [formula omitted] compared to 7.09⋅10−5 for the uniform dose treatment. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the adaptive dose modulation based on oxygenation map acquired before each fraction does results in slightly better tumor control compared to uniform dose delivery. However, the tumor control improvement is yet to be proven significant enough to justify the clinical implementation of hypoxia‐targeting dose modulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Radiation
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Hypoxia
Linear Models
Radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐BRC‐05 : The Role of Hypoxia in Radiation Treatment Planning. A Simulation Study. / Axente, M.; Lin, P.; Pugachev, A.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29108d8323d0437a9bf117aec3538c98,
title = "SU‐GG‐BRC‐05: The Role of Hypoxia in Radiation Treatment Planning. A Simulation Study",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the importance of hypoxia imaging for radiation treatment planning by evaluation of the effectiveness of modulated radiation treatments targeting hypoxia with increased doses. Method and Materials: Starting with a two‐dimensional diffusion model of tissue oxygenation, a planar tumor model was developed to simulate chronic and acute hypoxia as well as oxygenation/reoxygenation effects on the microscopic scale. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. Cell repopulation/tumor shrinkage was not considered, as to represent a slow‐growing tumor. Using this model, we evaluated the effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments targeting hypoxia with increased radiation doses. We compared different approaches to targeting hypoxia, including fixed dose modulation based on the pre‐treatment imaging of hypoxia and adaptive dose modulation based on interfraction imaging of hypoxia. Furthermore, to study the importance of hypoxia imaging resolution we compared two scenarios: 1. microscopic, where cell‐by‐cell imaging of hypoxia and dose delivery is possible, 2. macroscopic, where both imaging and irradiation can be conducted with 1mm resolution. Results: For a total tumor dose of 30Gy, the adaptive hypoxia‐targeting therapy provided the best tumor control for the microscopic scenario with [formula omitted] compared to [formula omitted] for the treatment with uniform dose of 2Gy per fraction. However, for a more realistic macroscopic scenario, the finite resolution of hypoxia imaging and dose delivery significantly reduced the therapeutic advantage of adaptive hypoxia targeted therapy resulting in [formula omitted] compared to 7.09⋅10−5 for the uniform dose treatment. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the adaptive dose modulation based on oxygenation map acquired before each fraction does results in slightly better tumor control compared to uniform dose delivery. However, the tumor control improvement is yet to be proven significant enough to justify the clinical implementation of hypoxia‐targeting dose modulation.",
author = "M. Axente and P. Lin and A. Pugachev",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐BRC‐05

T2 - The Role of Hypoxia in Radiation Treatment Planning. A Simulation Study

AU - Axente, M.

AU - Lin, P.

AU - Pugachev, A.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the importance of hypoxia imaging for radiation treatment planning by evaluation of the effectiveness of modulated radiation treatments targeting hypoxia with increased doses. Method and Materials: Starting with a two‐dimensional diffusion model of tissue oxygenation, a planar tumor model was developed to simulate chronic and acute hypoxia as well as oxygenation/reoxygenation effects on the microscopic scale. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. Cell repopulation/tumor shrinkage was not considered, as to represent a slow‐growing tumor. Using this model, we evaluated the effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments targeting hypoxia with increased radiation doses. We compared different approaches to targeting hypoxia, including fixed dose modulation based on the pre‐treatment imaging of hypoxia and adaptive dose modulation based on interfraction imaging of hypoxia. Furthermore, to study the importance of hypoxia imaging resolution we compared two scenarios: 1. microscopic, where cell‐by‐cell imaging of hypoxia and dose delivery is possible, 2. macroscopic, where both imaging and irradiation can be conducted with 1mm resolution. Results: For a total tumor dose of 30Gy, the adaptive hypoxia‐targeting therapy provided the best tumor control for the microscopic scenario with [formula omitted] compared to [formula omitted] for the treatment with uniform dose of 2Gy per fraction. However, for a more realistic macroscopic scenario, the finite resolution of hypoxia imaging and dose delivery significantly reduced the therapeutic advantage of adaptive hypoxia targeted therapy resulting in [formula omitted] compared to 7.09⋅10−5 for the uniform dose treatment. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the adaptive dose modulation based on oxygenation map acquired before each fraction does results in slightly better tumor control compared to uniform dose delivery. However, the tumor control improvement is yet to be proven significant enough to justify the clinical implementation of hypoxia‐targeting dose modulation.

AB - Purpose: To assess the importance of hypoxia imaging for radiation treatment planning by evaluation of the effectiveness of modulated radiation treatments targeting hypoxia with increased doses. Method and Materials: Starting with a two‐dimensional diffusion model of tissue oxygenation, a planar tumor model was developed to simulate chronic and acute hypoxia as well as oxygenation/reoxygenation effects on the microscopic scale. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. Cell repopulation/tumor shrinkage was not considered, as to represent a slow‐growing tumor. Using this model, we evaluated the effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments targeting hypoxia with increased radiation doses. We compared different approaches to targeting hypoxia, including fixed dose modulation based on the pre‐treatment imaging of hypoxia and adaptive dose modulation based on interfraction imaging of hypoxia. Furthermore, to study the importance of hypoxia imaging resolution we compared two scenarios: 1. microscopic, where cell‐by‐cell imaging of hypoxia and dose delivery is possible, 2. macroscopic, where both imaging and irradiation can be conducted with 1mm resolution. Results: For a total tumor dose of 30Gy, the adaptive hypoxia‐targeting therapy provided the best tumor control for the microscopic scenario with [formula omitted] compared to [formula omitted] for the treatment with uniform dose of 2Gy per fraction. However, for a more realistic macroscopic scenario, the finite resolution of hypoxia imaging and dose delivery significantly reduced the therapeutic advantage of adaptive hypoxia targeted therapy resulting in [formula omitted] compared to 7.09⋅10−5 for the uniform dose treatment. Conclusion: We have demonstrated that the adaptive dose modulation based on oxygenation map acquired before each fraction does results in slightly better tumor control compared to uniform dose delivery. However, the tumor control improvement is yet to be proven significant enough to justify the clinical implementation of hypoxia‐targeting dose modulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024793637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024793637&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182181

DO - 10.1118/1.3182181

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024793637

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -