Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials

David D. Rahn, Husam Abed, Vivian W. Sung, Kristen A. Matteson, Rebecca G. Rogers, Michelle Y. Morrill, Matthew D. Barber, Joseph I. Schaffer, Thomas L. Wheeler, Ethan M. Balk, Katrin Uhlig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: (1) To systematically collect and organize into clinical categories all outcomes reported in trials for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); (2) to rank the importance of outcomes for patient decision making; and (3) to improve future comparisons of effects in trials of AUB interventions. Study Design and Setting: Systematic review of English-language randomized controlled trials of AUB treatments in MEDLINE from 1950 to June 2008. All outcomes and definitions were extracted and organized into major outcome categories by an expert group. Each outcome was ranked "critically important," "important," or "not important" for informing patients' choices. Results: One hundred thirteen articles from 79 trials met the criteria. One hundred fourteen different outcomes were identified, only 15 (13%) of which were ranked as critically important and 29 (25%) as important. Outcomes were grouped into eight categories: (1) bleeding; (2) quality of life; (3) pain; (4) sexual health; (5) patient satisfaction; (6) bulk-related complaints; (7) need for subsequent surgical treatment; and (8) adverse events. Conclusion: To improve the quality, consistency, and utility of future AUB trials, we recommend assessing a limited number of clinical outcomes for bleeding, disease-specific quality of life, pain, sexual health, and bulk-related symptoms both before and after treatment and reporting satisfaction and adverse events. Further development of validated patient-based outcome measures and the standardization of outcome reporting are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-300
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Uterine Hemorrhage
Reproductive Health
Quality of Life
Hemorrhage
Pain
Patient Satisfaction
MEDLINE
Decision Making
Language
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Dysfunctional uterine bleeding
  • Endometrial ablation
  • Hysterectomy
  • Leiomyomata
  • Menorrhagia
  • Uterine artery embolization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. / Rahn, David D.; Abed, Husam; Sung, Vivian W.; Matteson, Kristen A.; Rogers, Rebecca G.; Morrill, Michelle Y.; Barber, Matthew D.; Schaffer, Joseph I.; Wheeler, Thomas L.; Balk, Ethan M.; Uhlig, Katrin.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 293-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rahn, DD, Abed, H, Sung, VW, Matteson, KA, Rogers, RG, Morrill, MY, Barber, MD, Schaffer, JI, Wheeler, TL, Balk, EM & Uhlig, K 2011, 'Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017
Rahn, David D. ; Abed, Husam ; Sung, Vivian W. ; Matteson, Kristen A. ; Rogers, Rebecca G. ; Morrill, Michelle Y. ; Barber, Matthew D. ; Schaffer, Joseph I. ; Wheeler, Thomas L. ; Balk, Ethan M. ; Uhlig, Katrin. / Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011 ; Vol. 64, No. 3. pp. 293-300.
@article{7810d1d5cdab4be084d843890dee1148,
title = "Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials",
abstract = "Objectives: (1) To systematically collect and organize into clinical categories all outcomes reported in trials for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); (2) to rank the importance of outcomes for patient decision making; and (3) to improve future comparisons of effects in trials of AUB interventions. Study Design and Setting: Systematic review of English-language randomized controlled trials of AUB treatments in MEDLINE from 1950 to June 2008. All outcomes and definitions were extracted and organized into major outcome categories by an expert group. Each outcome was ranked {"}critically important,{"} {"}important,{"} or {"}not important{"} for informing patients' choices. Results: One hundred thirteen articles from 79 trials met the criteria. One hundred fourteen different outcomes were identified, only 15 (13{\%}) of which were ranked as critically important and 29 (25{\%}) as important. Outcomes were grouped into eight categories: (1) bleeding; (2) quality of life; (3) pain; (4) sexual health; (5) patient satisfaction; (6) bulk-related complaints; (7) need for subsequent surgical treatment; and (8) adverse events. Conclusion: To improve the quality, consistency, and utility of future AUB trials, we recommend assessing a limited number of clinical outcomes for bleeding, disease-specific quality of life, pain, sexual health, and bulk-related symptoms both before and after treatment and reporting satisfaction and adverse events. Further development of validated patient-based outcome measures and the standardization of outcome reporting are needed.",
keywords = "Dysfunctional uterine bleeding, Endometrial ablation, Hysterectomy, Leiomyomata, Menorrhagia, Uterine artery embolization",
author = "Rahn, {David D.} and Husam Abed and Sung, {Vivian W.} and Matteson, {Kristen A.} and Rogers, {Rebecca G.} and Morrill, {Michelle Y.} and Barber, {Matthew D.} and Schaffer, {Joseph I.} and Wheeler, {Thomas L.} and Balk, {Ethan M.} and Katrin Uhlig",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "293--300",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials

AU - Rahn, David D.

AU - Abed, Husam

AU - Sung, Vivian W.

AU - Matteson, Kristen A.

AU - Rogers, Rebecca G.

AU - Morrill, Michelle Y.

AU - Barber, Matthew D.

AU - Schaffer, Joseph I.

AU - Wheeler, Thomas L.

AU - Balk, Ethan M.

AU - Uhlig, Katrin

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objectives: (1) To systematically collect and organize into clinical categories all outcomes reported in trials for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); (2) to rank the importance of outcomes for patient decision making; and (3) to improve future comparisons of effects in trials of AUB interventions. Study Design and Setting: Systematic review of English-language randomized controlled trials of AUB treatments in MEDLINE from 1950 to June 2008. All outcomes and definitions were extracted and organized into major outcome categories by an expert group. Each outcome was ranked "critically important," "important," or "not important" for informing patients' choices. Results: One hundred thirteen articles from 79 trials met the criteria. One hundred fourteen different outcomes were identified, only 15 (13%) of which were ranked as critically important and 29 (25%) as important. Outcomes were grouped into eight categories: (1) bleeding; (2) quality of life; (3) pain; (4) sexual health; (5) patient satisfaction; (6) bulk-related complaints; (7) need for subsequent surgical treatment; and (8) adverse events. Conclusion: To improve the quality, consistency, and utility of future AUB trials, we recommend assessing a limited number of clinical outcomes for bleeding, disease-specific quality of life, pain, sexual health, and bulk-related symptoms both before and after treatment and reporting satisfaction and adverse events. Further development of validated patient-based outcome measures and the standardization of outcome reporting are needed.

AB - Objectives: (1) To systematically collect and organize into clinical categories all outcomes reported in trials for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); (2) to rank the importance of outcomes for patient decision making; and (3) to improve future comparisons of effects in trials of AUB interventions. Study Design and Setting: Systematic review of English-language randomized controlled trials of AUB treatments in MEDLINE from 1950 to June 2008. All outcomes and definitions were extracted and organized into major outcome categories by an expert group. Each outcome was ranked "critically important," "important," or "not important" for informing patients' choices. Results: One hundred thirteen articles from 79 trials met the criteria. One hundred fourteen different outcomes were identified, only 15 (13%) of which were ranked as critically important and 29 (25%) as important. Outcomes were grouped into eight categories: (1) bleeding; (2) quality of life; (3) pain; (4) sexual health; (5) patient satisfaction; (6) bulk-related complaints; (7) need for subsequent surgical treatment; and (8) adverse events. Conclusion: To improve the quality, consistency, and utility of future AUB trials, we recommend assessing a limited number of clinical outcomes for bleeding, disease-specific quality of life, pain, sexual health, and bulk-related symptoms both before and after treatment and reporting satisfaction and adverse events. Further development of validated patient-based outcome measures and the standardization of outcome reporting are needed.

KW - Dysfunctional uterine bleeding

KW - Endometrial ablation

KW - Hysterectomy

KW - Leiomyomata

KW - Menorrhagia

KW - Uterine artery embolization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751648831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751648831&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.017

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 293

EP - 300

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 3

ER -