TH‐C‐137‐03: Implementing and Evaluating Aperture Morphing for CBCT‐Based Adaptive Planning

A. Zhao, A. Godley, K. Stephans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To implement and test a novel application of an online adaptive re‐planning technique, segment aperture morphing (SAM), to kV cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Methods: Five IMRT prostate patients with kV CBCT image guidance were chosen. The patients were re‐planned with Panther planning system (Prowess), 5 mm margin, prescribed PTV D95 of 76 Gy, prostate D100 of 78 Gy. Daily contours were generated on nine CBCTs each using ABAS (Elekta). SAM, as implemented in Panther, then executes to morph apertures based on changes in the beams eye view target shape thereby correcting for both deformation and translation of the target through MLC adjustments. The 45 SAM plans were compared to the current standard of IGRT based shifts. The Panther re‐plan, SAM and shifted plan calculations were done without heterogeneity corrections to avoid uncertainties in CBCT electron density. The DVH parameters used in treatment planning were compared between SAM and shifted. Results: The SAM method provided significantly better target coverage, P<0.0002 for all target DVH parameters. SAM maintained target coverage with average prostate D100 of 78Gy and PTV D95 76Gy, while repositioning left the target under‐dosed at 72Gy. SAM also decreased rectal dose, in particular reducing V60 from 15.4 to 14.0% (P=0.0185). On average bladder dose is lower for repositioning but this at the cost of considerably reduced target coverage, (shifted bladder dose correlates to target dose with an r2∼0.2.) In all but one fraction, the prostate is best covered by SAM. The contour generation takes ∼20‐60 seconds, SAM is instantaneous and the dose calculation ∼20 seconds. Conclusion: Aperture morphing based on target shape change determined by auto‐segmentation consistently and significantly improves target coverage and reduces rectal dose compared to rigid IGRT shifts. It is a viable method for CBCT‐based adaptive planning. A research version of ABAS was provided by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden, and a research version of Panther by Prowess Inc, Concord, CA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate
Urinary Bladder
Research
Sweden
Uncertainty
Electrons
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TH‐C‐137‐03 : Implementing and Evaluating Aperture Morphing for CBCT‐Based Adaptive Planning. / Zhao, A.; Godley, A.; Stephans, K.

In: Medical physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{00f632199808440fb1b0346f1f1e783f,
title = "TH‐C‐137‐03: Implementing and Evaluating Aperture Morphing for CBCT‐Based Adaptive Planning",
abstract = "Purpose: To implement and test a novel application of an online adaptive re‐planning technique, segment aperture morphing (SAM), to kV cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Methods: Five IMRT prostate patients with kV CBCT image guidance were chosen. The patients were re‐planned with Panther planning system (Prowess), 5 mm margin, prescribed PTV D95 of 76 Gy, prostate D100 of 78 Gy. Daily contours were generated on nine CBCTs each using ABAS (Elekta). SAM, as implemented in Panther, then executes to morph apertures based on changes in the beams eye view target shape thereby correcting for both deformation and translation of the target through MLC adjustments. The 45 SAM plans were compared to the current standard of IGRT based shifts. The Panther re‐plan, SAM and shifted plan calculations were done without heterogeneity corrections to avoid uncertainties in CBCT electron density. The DVH parameters used in treatment planning were compared between SAM and shifted. Results: The SAM method provided significantly better target coverage, P<0.0002 for all target DVH parameters. SAM maintained target coverage with average prostate D100 of 78Gy and PTV D95 76Gy, while repositioning left the target under‐dosed at 72Gy. SAM also decreased rectal dose, in particular reducing V60 from 15.4 to 14.0{\%} (P=0.0185). On average bladder dose is lower for repositioning but this at the cost of considerably reduced target coverage, (shifted bladder dose correlates to target dose with an r2∼0.2.) In all but one fraction, the prostate is best covered by SAM. The contour generation takes ∼20‐60 seconds, SAM is instantaneous and the dose calculation ∼20 seconds. Conclusion: Aperture morphing based on target shape change determined by auto‐segmentation consistently and significantly improves target coverage and reduces rectal dose compared to rigid IGRT shifts. It is a viable method for CBCT‐based adaptive planning. A research version of ABAS was provided by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden, and a research version of Panther by Prowess Inc, Concord, CA.",
author = "A. Zhao and A. Godley and K. Stephans",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1118/1.4815746",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TH‐C‐137‐03

T2 - Implementing and Evaluating Aperture Morphing for CBCT‐Based Adaptive Planning

AU - Zhao, A.

AU - Godley, A.

AU - Stephans, K.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Purpose: To implement and test a novel application of an online adaptive re‐planning technique, segment aperture morphing (SAM), to kV cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Methods: Five IMRT prostate patients with kV CBCT image guidance were chosen. The patients were re‐planned with Panther planning system (Prowess), 5 mm margin, prescribed PTV D95 of 76 Gy, prostate D100 of 78 Gy. Daily contours were generated on nine CBCTs each using ABAS (Elekta). SAM, as implemented in Panther, then executes to morph apertures based on changes in the beams eye view target shape thereby correcting for both deformation and translation of the target through MLC adjustments. The 45 SAM plans were compared to the current standard of IGRT based shifts. The Panther re‐plan, SAM and shifted plan calculations were done without heterogeneity corrections to avoid uncertainties in CBCT electron density. The DVH parameters used in treatment planning were compared between SAM and shifted. Results: The SAM method provided significantly better target coverage, P<0.0002 for all target DVH parameters. SAM maintained target coverage with average prostate D100 of 78Gy and PTV D95 76Gy, while repositioning left the target under‐dosed at 72Gy. SAM also decreased rectal dose, in particular reducing V60 from 15.4 to 14.0% (P=0.0185). On average bladder dose is lower for repositioning but this at the cost of considerably reduced target coverage, (shifted bladder dose correlates to target dose with an r2∼0.2.) In all but one fraction, the prostate is best covered by SAM. The contour generation takes ∼20‐60 seconds, SAM is instantaneous and the dose calculation ∼20 seconds. Conclusion: Aperture morphing based on target shape change determined by auto‐segmentation consistently and significantly improves target coverage and reduces rectal dose compared to rigid IGRT shifts. It is a viable method for CBCT‐based adaptive planning. A research version of ABAS was provided by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden, and a research version of Panther by Prowess Inc, Concord, CA.

AB - Purpose: To implement and test a novel application of an online adaptive re‐planning technique, segment aperture morphing (SAM), to kV cone‐beam CT (CBCT). Methods: Five IMRT prostate patients with kV CBCT image guidance were chosen. The patients were re‐planned with Panther planning system (Prowess), 5 mm margin, prescribed PTV D95 of 76 Gy, prostate D100 of 78 Gy. Daily contours were generated on nine CBCTs each using ABAS (Elekta). SAM, as implemented in Panther, then executes to morph apertures based on changes in the beams eye view target shape thereby correcting for both deformation and translation of the target through MLC adjustments. The 45 SAM plans were compared to the current standard of IGRT based shifts. The Panther re‐plan, SAM and shifted plan calculations were done without heterogeneity corrections to avoid uncertainties in CBCT electron density. The DVH parameters used in treatment planning were compared between SAM and shifted. Results: The SAM method provided significantly better target coverage, P<0.0002 for all target DVH parameters. SAM maintained target coverage with average prostate D100 of 78Gy and PTV D95 76Gy, while repositioning left the target under‐dosed at 72Gy. SAM also decreased rectal dose, in particular reducing V60 from 15.4 to 14.0% (P=0.0185). On average bladder dose is lower for repositioning but this at the cost of considerably reduced target coverage, (shifted bladder dose correlates to target dose with an r2∼0.2.) In all but one fraction, the prostate is best covered by SAM. The contour generation takes ∼20‐60 seconds, SAM is instantaneous and the dose calculation ∼20 seconds. Conclusion: Aperture morphing based on target shape change determined by auto‐segmentation consistently and significantly improves target coverage and reduces rectal dose compared to rigid IGRT shifts. It is a viable method for CBCT‐based adaptive planning. A research version of ABAS was provided by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden, and a research version of Panther by Prowess Inc, Concord, CA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024782166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024782166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4815746

DO - 10.1118/1.4815746

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024782166

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -