The effect of uncomplicated cataract surgery on intraocular pressure

A retrospective review

D. Todd Ford, Jess T. Whitson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of three different techniques of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) and identify those groups of patients in which a significant sustained reduction in IOP occurred. Methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative review was performed on 119 patients (143 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery by eight third-year residents at Parkland Memorial Hospital between January and December, 1997. Three groups of patients - normal, ocular hypertensives (OUT), and primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) - who underwent cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation by either extracapsular cataract extraction with manual expression (ECCE), scleral tunnel phacoemulsification (STP), or clear corneal phacoemulsification (CCP) were studied. Change in IOP at final exam (115 eyes available six months post-operatively) was measured and analyzed with respect to patient group, surgical technique performed, and preoperative axial length. Results: IOP was significantly lower at final exam in patients undergoing CCP and ECCE (17.9% and 16.3% drop from baseline, respectively). OUT patients experienced the greatest drop in IOP (22.1%) followed by POAG patients (16.7%) and normal patients (4.2%). Shorter eyes (<23.0 mm) were much more likely to experience a clinically significant (>20% from baseline) drop in IOP than longer eyes (61% vs 39%). Conclusion: Cataract extraction with PC-IOL implantation produces a sustained significant drop in IOP. The effect is most pronounced in OHT patients, patients with POAG, patients with shorter eyes, and those undergoing CCP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-416
Number of pages5
JournalClinical and Surgical Ophthalmology
Volume21
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Intraocular Pressure
Cataract
Phacoemulsification
Cataract Extraction
Intraocular Lens Implantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The effect of uncomplicated cataract surgery on intraocular pressure : A retrospective review. / Ford, D. Todd; Whitson, Jess T.

In: Clinical and Surgical Ophthalmology, Vol. 21, No. 10, 10.2003, p. 412-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba452e438aa847ccb84b4469898982eb,
title = "The effect of uncomplicated cataract surgery on intraocular pressure: A retrospective review",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the effect of three different techniques of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) and identify those groups of patients in which a significant sustained reduction in IOP occurred. Methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative review was performed on 119 patients (143 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery by eight third-year residents at Parkland Memorial Hospital between January and December, 1997. Three groups of patients - normal, ocular hypertensives (OUT), and primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) - who underwent cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation by either extracapsular cataract extraction with manual expression (ECCE), scleral tunnel phacoemulsification (STP), or clear corneal phacoemulsification (CCP) were studied. Change in IOP at final exam (115 eyes available six months post-operatively) was measured and analyzed with respect to patient group, surgical technique performed, and preoperative axial length. Results: IOP was significantly lower at final exam in patients undergoing CCP and ECCE (17.9{\%} and 16.3{\%} drop from baseline, respectively). OUT patients experienced the greatest drop in IOP (22.1{\%}) followed by POAG patients (16.7{\%}) and normal patients (4.2{\%}). Shorter eyes (<23.0 mm) were much more likely to experience a clinically significant (>20{\%} from baseline) drop in IOP than longer eyes (61{\%} vs 39{\%}). Conclusion: Cataract extraction with PC-IOL implantation produces a sustained significant drop in IOP. The effect is most pronounced in OHT patients, patients with POAG, patients with shorter eyes, and those undergoing CCP.",
author = "Ford, {D. Todd} and Whitson, {Jess T.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "412--416",
journal = "Clinical and Surgical Ophthalmology",
issn = "1705-4842",
publisher = "Mediconcept Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of uncomplicated cataract surgery on intraocular pressure

T2 - A retrospective review

AU - Ford, D. Todd

AU - Whitson, Jess T.

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Purpose: To determine the effect of three different techniques of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) and identify those groups of patients in which a significant sustained reduction in IOP occurred. Methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative review was performed on 119 patients (143 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery by eight third-year residents at Parkland Memorial Hospital between January and December, 1997. Three groups of patients - normal, ocular hypertensives (OUT), and primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) - who underwent cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation by either extracapsular cataract extraction with manual expression (ECCE), scleral tunnel phacoemulsification (STP), or clear corneal phacoemulsification (CCP) were studied. Change in IOP at final exam (115 eyes available six months post-operatively) was measured and analyzed with respect to patient group, surgical technique performed, and preoperative axial length. Results: IOP was significantly lower at final exam in patients undergoing CCP and ECCE (17.9% and 16.3% drop from baseline, respectively). OUT patients experienced the greatest drop in IOP (22.1%) followed by POAG patients (16.7%) and normal patients (4.2%). Shorter eyes (<23.0 mm) were much more likely to experience a clinically significant (>20% from baseline) drop in IOP than longer eyes (61% vs 39%). Conclusion: Cataract extraction with PC-IOL implantation produces a sustained significant drop in IOP. The effect is most pronounced in OHT patients, patients with POAG, patients with shorter eyes, and those undergoing CCP.

AB - Purpose: To determine the effect of three different techniques of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) and identify those groups of patients in which a significant sustained reduction in IOP occurred. Methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative review was performed on 119 patients (143 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery by eight third-year residents at Parkland Memorial Hospital between January and December, 1997. Three groups of patients - normal, ocular hypertensives (OUT), and primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) - who underwent cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) implantation by either extracapsular cataract extraction with manual expression (ECCE), scleral tunnel phacoemulsification (STP), or clear corneal phacoemulsification (CCP) were studied. Change in IOP at final exam (115 eyes available six months post-operatively) was measured and analyzed with respect to patient group, surgical technique performed, and preoperative axial length. Results: IOP was significantly lower at final exam in patients undergoing CCP and ECCE (17.9% and 16.3% drop from baseline, respectively). OUT patients experienced the greatest drop in IOP (22.1%) followed by POAG patients (16.7%) and normal patients (4.2%). Shorter eyes (<23.0 mm) were much more likely to experience a clinically significant (>20% from baseline) drop in IOP than longer eyes (61% vs 39%). Conclusion: Cataract extraction with PC-IOL implantation produces a sustained significant drop in IOP. The effect is most pronounced in OHT patients, patients with POAG, patients with shorter eyes, and those undergoing CCP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9344270464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9344270464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 412

EP - 416

JO - Clinical and Surgical Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical and Surgical Ophthalmology

SN - 1705-4842

IS - 10

ER -