The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention

Fengpei Hu, Changyong Jiao, Songpo Zhao, Huahua Dong, Xiao Liu, Yuji Yi, Jun Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Object-based attention has been documented as an important mechanism with which to control attention in several studies. To date, two main hypotheses have been proposed to interpret object-based attention: attention spreading and prioritization of search. There is evidence that supports these hypotheses in the literature. In the present study, we sought to compare these two hypotheses systematically by manipulating two factors: the integration of the target and background and the presence of attention pre-allocation. For this purpose, we used a flanker task in which the location of the task-relevant target was fixed, but the relationship between the target and the background varied. In addition, attention pre-allocation was presented in only half of the conditions. The results revealed that the attention spreading hypothesis was supported only when attention was not pre-allocated and target-background integration was high; however, the prioritization hypothesis was supported in all other conditions. Our findings provide insight into the comparisons of the attention spreading and prioritization hypotheses. Furthermore, our findings suggest that attention resources may be the underlying factor determining appropriate strategy in the control of attention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0119414
JournalPLoS One
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 19 2015

Fingerprint

prioritization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention. / Hu, Fengpei; Jiao, Changyong; Zhao, Songpo; Dong, Huahua; Liu, Xiao; Yi, Yuji; Wang, Jun.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 3, e0119414, 19.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hu, Fengpei ; Jiao, Changyong ; Zhao, Songpo ; Dong, Huahua ; Liu, Xiao ; Yi, Yuji ; Wang, Jun. / The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 3.
@article{f4848f10e7fc4fec9baf924d8f0e72fe,
title = "The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention",
abstract = "Object-based attention has been documented as an important mechanism with which to control attention in several studies. To date, two main hypotheses have been proposed to interpret object-based attention: attention spreading and prioritization of search. There is evidence that supports these hypotheses in the literature. In the present study, we sought to compare these two hypotheses systematically by manipulating two factors: the integration of the target and background and the presence of attention pre-allocation. For this purpose, we used a flanker task in which the location of the task-relevant target was fixed, but the relationship between the target and the background varied. In addition, attention pre-allocation was presented in only half of the conditions. The results revealed that the attention spreading hypothesis was supported only when attention was not pre-allocated and target-background integration was high; however, the prioritization hypothesis was supported in all other conditions. Our findings provide insight into the comparisons of the attention spreading and prioritization hypotheses. Furthermore, our findings suggest that attention resources may be the underlying factor determining appropriate strategy in the control of attention.",
author = "Fengpei Hu and Changyong Jiao and Songpo Zhao and Huahua Dong and Xiao Liu and Yuji Yi and Jun Wang",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0119414",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of attention pre-allocation and target-background integration on object-based attention

AU - Hu, Fengpei

AU - Jiao, Changyong

AU - Zhao, Songpo

AU - Dong, Huahua

AU - Liu, Xiao

AU - Yi, Yuji

AU - Wang, Jun

PY - 2015/3/19

Y1 - 2015/3/19

N2 - Object-based attention has been documented as an important mechanism with which to control attention in several studies. To date, two main hypotheses have been proposed to interpret object-based attention: attention spreading and prioritization of search. There is evidence that supports these hypotheses in the literature. In the present study, we sought to compare these two hypotheses systematically by manipulating two factors: the integration of the target and background and the presence of attention pre-allocation. For this purpose, we used a flanker task in which the location of the task-relevant target was fixed, but the relationship between the target and the background varied. In addition, attention pre-allocation was presented in only half of the conditions. The results revealed that the attention spreading hypothesis was supported only when attention was not pre-allocated and target-background integration was high; however, the prioritization hypothesis was supported in all other conditions. Our findings provide insight into the comparisons of the attention spreading and prioritization hypotheses. Furthermore, our findings suggest that attention resources may be the underlying factor determining appropriate strategy in the control of attention.

AB - Object-based attention has been documented as an important mechanism with which to control attention in several studies. To date, two main hypotheses have been proposed to interpret object-based attention: attention spreading and prioritization of search. There is evidence that supports these hypotheses in the literature. In the present study, we sought to compare these two hypotheses systematically by manipulating two factors: the integration of the target and background and the presence of attention pre-allocation. For this purpose, we used a flanker task in which the location of the task-relevant target was fixed, but the relationship between the target and the background varied. In addition, attention pre-allocation was presented in only half of the conditions. The results revealed that the attention spreading hypothesis was supported only when attention was not pre-allocated and target-background integration was high; however, the prioritization hypothesis was supported in all other conditions. Our findings provide insight into the comparisons of the attention spreading and prioritization hypotheses. Furthermore, our findings suggest that attention resources may be the underlying factor determining appropriate strategy in the control of attention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925436675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925436675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119414

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0119414

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e0119414

ER -