The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED: A review of the literature

Michael Gottlieb, Brit Long, Alex Koyfman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in the U.S. Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for care, including analgesia and treatments to facilitate stone passage. Objective: With the new evidence concerning the evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis, this review summarizes current literature regarding the ED management of urolithiasis. Discussion: Urolithiasis occurs primarily through supersaturation of urine and commonly presents with flank pain, hematuria, and nausea/vomiting. History, examination, and assessment with several laboratory tests are cornerstones of evaluation. Urinalysis is not diagnostic, but it may be used in association with other assessments. Risk assessment tools and advanced imaging can assist with diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard. Newer low-dose CT imaging may reduce radiation. Recent studies support ultrasound as an alternate diagnostic modality, especially in pediatric and pregnant patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain first-line therapy, with opioids or intravenous lidocaine reserved for refractory pain. Tamsulosin can increase passage in larger stones but has not demonstrated benefit in smaller stones. Nifedipine and intravenous fluids are not recommended to facilitate passage. Surgical intervention is based upon stone size, duration, and modifying factors. Patients who are discharged should be advised on dietary changes. Conclusion: Urolithiasis is a common disease increasing in prevalence with the potential for significant morbidity. Focused evaluation with history, examination, and testing is important in diagnosis and management. Understanding the clinical features, risk assessment tools, imaging options, and treatment options can assist emergency physicians in the management of urolithiasis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)699-706
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Urolithiasis
Hospital Emergency Service
tamsulosin
History
Tomography
Flank Pain
Intractable Pain
Urinalysis
Emergency Medical Services
Hematuria
Therapeutics
Nifedipine
Lidocaine
Analgesia
Nausea
Opioid Analgesics
Vomiting
Emergencies
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Urine

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Kidney stone
  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Renal stone
  • Urolithiasis
  • Urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED : A review of the literature. / Gottlieb, Michael; Long, Brit; Koyfman, Alex.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 699-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{5badb6146b15403fa5e7958a685f6245,
title = "The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED: A review of the literature",
abstract = "Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in the U.S. Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for care, including analgesia and treatments to facilitate stone passage. Objective: With the new evidence concerning the evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis, this review summarizes current literature regarding the ED management of urolithiasis. Discussion: Urolithiasis occurs primarily through supersaturation of urine and commonly presents with flank pain, hematuria, and nausea/vomiting. History, examination, and assessment with several laboratory tests are cornerstones of evaluation. Urinalysis is not diagnostic, but it may be used in association with other assessments. Risk assessment tools and advanced imaging can assist with diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard. Newer low-dose CT imaging may reduce radiation. Recent studies support ultrasound as an alternate diagnostic modality, especially in pediatric and pregnant patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain first-line therapy, with opioids or intravenous lidocaine reserved for refractory pain. Tamsulosin can increase passage in larger stones but has not demonstrated benefit in smaller stones. Nifedipine and intravenous fluids are not recommended to facilitate passage. Surgical intervention is based upon stone size, duration, and modifying factors. Patients who are discharged should be advised on dietary changes. Conclusion: Urolithiasis is a common disease increasing in prevalence with the potential for significant morbidity. Focused evaluation with history, examination, and testing is important in diagnosis and management. Understanding the clinical features, risk assessment tools, imaging options, and treatment options can assist emergency physicians in the management of urolithiasis.",
keywords = "Analgesia, Kidney stone, Nephrolithiasis, Renal stone, Urolithiasis, Urology",
author = "Michael Gottlieb and Brit Long and Alex Koyfman",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "699--706",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation and management of urolithiasis in the ED

T2 - A review of the literature

AU - Gottlieb, Michael

AU - Long, Brit

AU - Koyfman, Alex

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in the U.S. Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for care, including analgesia and treatments to facilitate stone passage. Objective: With the new evidence concerning the evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis, this review summarizes current literature regarding the ED management of urolithiasis. Discussion: Urolithiasis occurs primarily through supersaturation of urine and commonly presents with flank pain, hematuria, and nausea/vomiting. History, examination, and assessment with several laboratory tests are cornerstones of evaluation. Urinalysis is not diagnostic, but it may be used in association with other assessments. Risk assessment tools and advanced imaging can assist with diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard. Newer low-dose CT imaging may reduce radiation. Recent studies support ultrasound as an alternate diagnostic modality, especially in pediatric and pregnant patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain first-line therapy, with opioids or intravenous lidocaine reserved for refractory pain. Tamsulosin can increase passage in larger stones but has not demonstrated benefit in smaller stones. Nifedipine and intravenous fluids are not recommended to facilitate passage. Surgical intervention is based upon stone size, duration, and modifying factors. Patients who are discharged should be advised on dietary changes. Conclusion: Urolithiasis is a common disease increasing in prevalence with the potential for significant morbidity. Focused evaluation with history, examination, and testing is important in diagnosis and management. Understanding the clinical features, risk assessment tools, imaging options, and treatment options can assist emergency physicians in the management of urolithiasis.

AB - Background: Urolithiasis is a common condition in the U.S. Patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) for care, including analgesia and treatments to facilitate stone passage. Objective: With the new evidence concerning the evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis, this review summarizes current literature regarding the ED management of urolithiasis. Discussion: Urolithiasis occurs primarily through supersaturation of urine and commonly presents with flank pain, hematuria, and nausea/vomiting. History, examination, and assessment with several laboratory tests are cornerstones of evaluation. Urinalysis is not diagnostic, but it may be used in association with other assessments. Risk assessment tools and advanced imaging can assist with diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard. Newer low-dose CT imaging may reduce radiation. Recent studies support ultrasound as an alternate diagnostic modality, especially in pediatric and pregnant patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remain first-line therapy, with opioids or intravenous lidocaine reserved for refractory pain. Tamsulosin can increase passage in larger stones but has not demonstrated benefit in smaller stones. Nifedipine and intravenous fluids are not recommended to facilitate passage. Surgical intervention is based upon stone size, duration, and modifying factors. Patients who are discharged should be advised on dietary changes. Conclusion: Urolithiasis is a common disease increasing in prevalence with the potential for significant morbidity. Focused evaluation with history, examination, and testing is important in diagnosis and management. Understanding the clinical features, risk assessment tools, imaging options, and treatment options can assist emergency physicians in the management of urolithiasis.

KW - Analgesia

KW - Kidney stone

KW - Nephrolithiasis

KW - Renal stone

KW - Urolithiasis

KW - Urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045575376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045575376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.003

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29321112

AN - SCOPUS:85045575376

VL - 36

SP - 699

EP - 706

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 4

ER -