The radiographic prevalence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in normal and congenitally thin temporal bones

Brandon Isaacson, Jeffrey T. Vrabec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion on routine temporal bone computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive temporal bone CT examinations for a total of 556 sides were reviewed. One hundred ninety-one sides were excluded. Reasons for exclusion included reconstructed coronal views, no coronal views, or a pathologic process, which involved the geniculate ganglion. Six examinations were from patients with clinical superior canal dehiscence confirmed by surgical repair or positive vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Twenty-four scans were from patients with radiographic superior canal dehiscence confirmed by two independent readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in patients with and without radiographic or clinical superior canal dehiscence. Dehiscent geniculate ganglion was defined as at least two consecutive cuts on a coronal CT showing no bone overlying the geniculate ganglion. RESULTS: The overall incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion was 14.5% in the 365 sides reviewed. The incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion is increased in patients with radiographic and clinical superior canal dehiscence as compared with normal patients and was significantly different by χ analysis (38.1 versus 11.4%). CONCLUSION: The presence of radiographic geniculate ganglion dehiscence is common. This finding has particular importance when the middle cranial fossa or subtemporal approach is used, as the facial nerve is more at risk especially when used to address superior canal dehiscence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-110
Number of pages4
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Geniculate Ganglion
Temporal Bone
Tomography
Incidence
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
Middle Cranial Fossa
Facial Nerve
Pathologic Processes
Tertiary Care Centers
Reading
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Facial nerve
  • Geniculate ganglion
  • Middle fossa
  • Skull base
  • Subtemporal approach
  • Temporal bone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

The radiographic prevalence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in normal and congenitally thin temporal bones. / Isaacson, Brandon; Vrabec, Jeffrey T.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 107-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0725db408fdc4ea0a9692c906c7661ce,
title = "The radiographic prevalence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in normal and congenitally thin temporal bones",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion on routine temporal bone computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive temporal bone CT examinations for a total of 556 sides were reviewed. One hundred ninety-one sides were excluded. Reasons for exclusion included reconstructed coronal views, no coronal views, or a pathologic process, which involved the geniculate ganglion. Six examinations were from patients with clinical superior canal dehiscence confirmed by surgical repair or positive vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Twenty-four scans were from patients with radiographic superior canal dehiscence confirmed by two independent readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in patients with and without radiographic or clinical superior canal dehiscence. Dehiscent geniculate ganglion was defined as at least two consecutive cuts on a coronal CT showing no bone overlying the geniculate ganglion. RESULTS: The overall incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion was 14.5{\%} in the 365 sides reviewed. The incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion is increased in patients with radiographic and clinical superior canal dehiscence as compared with normal patients and was significantly different by χ analysis (38.1 versus 11.4{\%}). CONCLUSION: The presence of radiographic geniculate ganglion dehiscence is common. This finding has particular importance when the middle cranial fossa or subtemporal approach is used, as the facial nerve is more at risk especially when used to address superior canal dehiscence.",
keywords = "Facial nerve, Geniculate ganglion, Middle fossa, Skull base, Subtemporal approach, Temporal bone",
author = "Brandon Isaacson and Vrabec, {Jeffrey T.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.mao.0000235968.53474.77",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "107--110",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The radiographic prevalence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in normal and congenitally thin temporal bones

AU - Isaacson, Brandon

AU - Vrabec, Jeffrey T.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion on routine temporal bone computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive temporal bone CT examinations for a total of 556 sides were reviewed. One hundred ninety-one sides were excluded. Reasons for exclusion included reconstructed coronal views, no coronal views, or a pathologic process, which involved the geniculate ganglion. Six examinations were from patients with clinical superior canal dehiscence confirmed by surgical repair or positive vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Twenty-four scans were from patients with radiographic superior canal dehiscence confirmed by two independent readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in patients with and without radiographic or clinical superior canal dehiscence. Dehiscent geniculate ganglion was defined as at least two consecutive cuts on a coronal CT showing no bone overlying the geniculate ganglion. RESULTS: The overall incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion was 14.5% in the 365 sides reviewed. The incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion is increased in patients with radiographic and clinical superior canal dehiscence as compared with normal patients and was significantly different by χ analysis (38.1 versus 11.4%). CONCLUSION: The presence of radiographic geniculate ganglion dehiscence is common. This finding has particular importance when the middle cranial fossa or subtemporal approach is used, as the facial nerve is more at risk especially when used to address superior canal dehiscence.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion on routine temporal bone computed tomography (CT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-eight consecutive temporal bone CT examinations for a total of 556 sides were reviewed. One hundred ninety-one sides were excluded. Reasons for exclusion included reconstructed coronal views, no coronal views, or a pathologic process, which involved the geniculate ganglion. Six examinations were from patients with clinical superior canal dehiscence confirmed by surgical repair or positive vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Twenty-four scans were from patients with radiographic superior canal dehiscence confirmed by two independent readings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of geniculate ganglion dehiscence in patients with and without radiographic or clinical superior canal dehiscence. Dehiscent geniculate ganglion was defined as at least two consecutive cuts on a coronal CT showing no bone overlying the geniculate ganglion. RESULTS: The overall incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion was 14.5% in the 365 sides reviewed. The incidence of a dehiscent geniculate ganglion is increased in patients with radiographic and clinical superior canal dehiscence as compared with normal patients and was significantly different by χ analysis (38.1 versus 11.4%). CONCLUSION: The presence of radiographic geniculate ganglion dehiscence is common. This finding has particular importance when the middle cranial fossa or subtemporal approach is used, as the facial nerve is more at risk especially when used to address superior canal dehiscence.

KW - Facial nerve

KW - Geniculate ganglion

KW - Middle fossa

KW - Skull base

KW - Subtemporal approach

KW - Temporal bone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845977748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845977748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mao.0000235968.53474.77

DO - 10.1097/01.mao.0000235968.53474.77

M3 - Article

C2 - 17031323

AN - SCOPUS:33845977748

VL - 28

SP - 107

EP - 110

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 1

ER -