The RNA component of telomerase as a marker of biologic potential and clinical outcome in childhood neuroblastic tumors

Anirban Maitra, Kazuo Yashima, Asha Rathi, Charles F. Timmons, Beverly Barton Rogers, Jerry W. Shay, Adi F. Gazdar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein enzyme associated with cellular immortality that may be useful in determining the biologic potential of a tumor. Neuroblastoma (NB), ganglioneuroblastoma (GNB), and ganglioneuroma (GN) are neuroblastic tumors (NTs) that exhibit a spectrum of histologic features and are often associated with unpredictable behavior and clinical outcome. METHODS. The authors investigated the expression of the RNA component of human telomerase (hTR) by in situ hybridization in 32 cases of NTs (including 24 NBs, 4 GNBs, and 4 GNs), using [35S]-UTP labeled single stranded sense and antisense RNA probes. Eight NBs were early stage, 12 NBs were advanced stage, and 4 NBs were Stage IVS, a widely metastatic variant associated with an excellent clinical prognosis. Four NBs had N-myc amplification. In addition, the authors compared a proliferation marker, MIB- 1, with hTR expression in a subset of tumors. RESULTS. Thirty of 32 NTs expressed hTR, with expression varying from weak (1+) to intense (4+). Most advanced stage NBs (9 of 12) and only 2 of 8 early stage NBs had moderate to intense (2 to 4+) expression of hTR. The remaining early stage tumors (6 of 8) and 3 of 12 advanced stage NBs had absent or weak expression of hTR (0 to 1+). There was no disease progression in any of the patients with absent or weak expression of hTR. In contrast, 8 tumors (from 7 patients) with moderate to intense expression of hTR in the tumor sections had adverse clinical outcomes, including recurrence, persistent disease or death. hTR expression in all the Stage IVS tumors was weak, despite the fact that the patients had widely metastatic disease at presentation. The mean hTR score of 3.1 for NBs associated with an adverse outcome (n = 8) was significantly different from the mean hTR score of 1.3 for NBs associated with a favorable outcome (n = 16), P < 0.001. hTR expression in the GNB/GNs was limited to the ganglion cells only; Schwann cells were negative for hTR expression. Stage IVS tumors, which are associated with an excellent outcome, had high MIB-1 but weak hTR expression, indicating that the latter may be a better discriminator of true biologic potential and that hTR levels do not always correlate with cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS. Increased hTR expression may reflect the potential for aggressive behavior within the spectrum of NTs; conversely, down-regulation of hTR may be useful in identifying subsets with limited capacity for progression and a favorable prognosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-749
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1 1999

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Adrenal medulla
  • In situ hybridization assay
  • Neuroblastic tumors
  • Neuroblastoma
  • RNA component
  • Telomerase

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this