The status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States

Results of a national survey

G. F. Cromes, P. A. Helm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A survey to determine the status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States was developed and sent to 186 burn treatment facilities. The facilities were divided into four groups based upon number of admissions per year (0 to 80, 81 to 120, 121 to 200, and 200+). Completed surveys were received from 114 facilities. Results indicated that burn facilities of different sizes were consistent with respect to the severity of burn injuries treated, the length of hospitalization for acute injuries, and the duration of physician follow-up after discharge. Burn facilities with more admissions were more likely to report (1) organized outpatient burn rehabilitation programs, (2) available specialized bum rehabilitation personnel, (3) regular interdisciplinary inpatient staffing conferences and outpatient clinics, and (4) structured educational activities for staff and patients. Full-time equivalent burn rehabilitation personnel were equally represented across facilities of different sizes. The overall results suggest that there have been substantial improvements in the comprehensiveness of burn rehabilitation care since a previous survey in 1983. Minimum guidelines for burn rehabilitation are suggested based upon the relative consistency between burn facilities indicated by the survey results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-662
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation
Volume13
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Wounds and Injuries
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Inpatients
Hospitalization
Outpatients
Guidelines
Physicians
Education
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Surgery
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

The status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States : Results of a national survey. / Cromes, G. F.; Helm, P. A.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1992, p. 656-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b4dfab78b6141208973400e575b3ba3,
title = "The status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States: Results of a national survey",
abstract = "A survey to determine the status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States was developed and sent to 186 burn treatment facilities. The facilities were divided into four groups based upon number of admissions per year (0 to 80, 81 to 120, 121 to 200, and 200+). Completed surveys were received from 114 facilities. Results indicated that burn facilities of different sizes were consistent with respect to the severity of burn injuries treated, the length of hospitalization for acute injuries, and the duration of physician follow-up after discharge. Burn facilities with more admissions were more likely to report (1) organized outpatient burn rehabilitation programs, (2) available specialized bum rehabilitation personnel, (3) regular interdisciplinary inpatient staffing conferences and outpatient clinics, and (4) structured educational activities for staff and patients. Full-time equivalent burn rehabilitation personnel were equally represented across facilities of different sizes. The overall results suggest that there have been substantial improvements in the comprehensiveness of burn rehabilitation care since a previous survey in 1983. Minimum guidelines for burn rehabilitation are suggested based upon the relative consistency between burn facilities indicated by the survey results.",
author = "Cromes, {G. F.} and Helm, {P. A.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "656--662",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States

T2 - Results of a national survey

AU - Cromes, G. F.

AU - Helm, P. A.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - A survey to determine the status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States was developed and sent to 186 burn treatment facilities. The facilities were divided into four groups based upon number of admissions per year (0 to 80, 81 to 120, 121 to 200, and 200+). Completed surveys were received from 114 facilities. Results indicated that burn facilities of different sizes were consistent with respect to the severity of burn injuries treated, the length of hospitalization for acute injuries, and the duration of physician follow-up after discharge. Burn facilities with more admissions were more likely to report (1) organized outpatient burn rehabilitation programs, (2) available specialized bum rehabilitation personnel, (3) regular interdisciplinary inpatient staffing conferences and outpatient clinics, and (4) structured educational activities for staff and patients. Full-time equivalent burn rehabilitation personnel were equally represented across facilities of different sizes. The overall results suggest that there have been substantial improvements in the comprehensiveness of burn rehabilitation care since a previous survey in 1983. Minimum guidelines for burn rehabilitation are suggested based upon the relative consistency between burn facilities indicated by the survey results.

AB - A survey to determine the status of burn rehabilitation services in the United States was developed and sent to 186 burn treatment facilities. The facilities were divided into four groups based upon number of admissions per year (0 to 80, 81 to 120, 121 to 200, and 200+). Completed surveys were received from 114 facilities. Results indicated that burn facilities of different sizes were consistent with respect to the severity of burn injuries treated, the length of hospitalization for acute injuries, and the duration of physician follow-up after discharge. Burn facilities with more admissions were more likely to report (1) organized outpatient burn rehabilitation programs, (2) available specialized bum rehabilitation personnel, (3) regular interdisciplinary inpatient staffing conferences and outpatient clinics, and (4) structured educational activities for staff and patients. Full-time equivalent burn rehabilitation personnel were equally represented across facilities of different sizes. The overall results suggest that there have been substantial improvements in the comprehensiveness of burn rehabilitation care since a previous survey in 1983. Minimum guidelines for burn rehabilitation are suggested based upon the relative consistency between burn facilities indicated by the survey results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027077942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027077942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 656

EP - 662

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 6

ER -