The value of orbital echography in orbital practice

Kamel M. Itani, Bartley Frueh, Christine Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty-three consecutive patients with orbital masses who were referred to a major medical center and later had biopsies underwent ophthalmic echographic evaluation. The efficacy of orbital echography was compared with both the clinical evaluation and other orbital imaging methods (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). Echography was successful in all patients (100%) in detecting the orbital mass. The diagnosis was accurate in 18 of 22 patients (82%) echographically, 12 of 14 patients (86%) clinically, and 11 of 13 patients (85%) radiologically when a short differential was attempted. If all the patients examined were considered, echographic evaluation arrived at an accurate diagnosis in 18 of 23 patients (78%), clinical impression was accurate in 12 of 23 patients (52%), and radiologic evaluation was accurate in 11 of 20 patients (55%). In three patients, echography was the only imaging method used. The role of ophthalmic echography in the diagnosis of orbital masses is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-435
Number of pages4
JournalOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume14
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Biopsy

Keywords

  • Computed tomography scan
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Orbital echography
  • Orbital masses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgery

Cite this

The value of orbital echography in orbital practice. / Itani, Kamel M.; Frueh, Bartley; Nelson, Christine.

In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1998, p. 432-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Itani, Kamel M. ; Frueh, Bartley ; Nelson, Christine. / The value of orbital echography in orbital practice. In: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1998 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 432-435.
@article{ca5b672ad4144e13b73137a6b7e85d00,
title = "The value of orbital echography in orbital practice",
abstract = "Twenty-three consecutive patients with orbital masses who were referred to a major medical center and later had biopsies underwent ophthalmic echographic evaluation. The efficacy of orbital echography was compared with both the clinical evaluation and other orbital imaging methods (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). Echography was successful in all patients (100{\%}) in detecting the orbital mass. The diagnosis was accurate in 18 of 22 patients (82{\%}) echographically, 12 of 14 patients (86{\%}) clinically, and 11 of 13 patients (85{\%}) radiologically when a short differential was attempted. If all the patients examined were considered, echographic evaluation arrived at an accurate diagnosis in 18 of 23 patients (78{\%}), clinical impression was accurate in 12 of 23 patients (52{\%}), and radiologic evaluation was accurate in 11 of 20 patients (55{\%}). In three patients, echography was the only imaging method used. The role of ophthalmic echography in the diagnosis of orbital masses is discussed.",
keywords = "Computed tomography scan, Magnetic resonance imaging, Orbital echography, Orbital masses",
author = "Itani, {Kamel M.} and Bartley Frueh and Christine Nelson",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "432--435",
journal = "Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0740-9303",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of orbital echography in orbital practice

AU - Itani, Kamel M.

AU - Frueh, Bartley

AU - Nelson, Christine

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Twenty-three consecutive patients with orbital masses who were referred to a major medical center and later had biopsies underwent ophthalmic echographic evaluation. The efficacy of orbital echography was compared with both the clinical evaluation and other orbital imaging methods (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). Echography was successful in all patients (100%) in detecting the orbital mass. The diagnosis was accurate in 18 of 22 patients (82%) echographically, 12 of 14 patients (86%) clinically, and 11 of 13 patients (85%) radiologically when a short differential was attempted. If all the patients examined were considered, echographic evaluation arrived at an accurate diagnosis in 18 of 23 patients (78%), clinical impression was accurate in 12 of 23 patients (52%), and radiologic evaluation was accurate in 11 of 20 patients (55%). In three patients, echography was the only imaging method used. The role of ophthalmic echography in the diagnosis of orbital masses is discussed.

AB - Twenty-three consecutive patients with orbital masses who were referred to a major medical center and later had biopsies underwent ophthalmic echographic evaluation. The efficacy of orbital echography was compared with both the clinical evaluation and other orbital imaging methods (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging). Echography was successful in all patients (100%) in detecting the orbital mass. The diagnosis was accurate in 18 of 22 patients (82%) echographically, 12 of 14 patients (86%) clinically, and 11 of 13 patients (85%) radiologically when a short differential was attempted. If all the patients examined were considered, echographic evaluation arrived at an accurate diagnosis in 18 of 23 patients (78%), clinical impression was accurate in 12 of 23 patients (52%), and radiologic evaluation was accurate in 11 of 20 patients (55%). In three patients, echography was the only imaging method used. The role of ophthalmic echography in the diagnosis of orbital masses is discussed.

KW - Computed tomography scan

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Orbital echography

KW - Orbital masses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031789988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031789988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 432

EP - 435

JO - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0740-9303

IS - 6

ER -