Time to rehabilitation in the burn population: Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset

Jeffrey C. Schneider, Wei Han Tan, Richard Goldstein, Jacqueline M. Mix, Paulette Niewczyk, Margaret A. DiVita, Colleen M. Ryan, Paul B. Gerrard, Karen Kowalske, Ross Zafonte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A preliminary investigation of the burn rehabilitation population found a large variability of zero onset day frequency between facilities. Onset days is defined as the time from injury to inpatient rehabilitation admission; this variable has not been investigated in burn patients previously. This study explored if this finding was a facility-based phenomena or characteristic of burn inpatient rehabilitation patients. This study was a secondary analysis of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr®) data from 2002 to 2007 examining inpatient rehabilitation characteristics among patients with burn injuries. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years and discharge against medical advice. Comparisons of demographic, medical and functional data were made between facilities with a high frequency of zero onset days versus facilities with a low frequency of zero onset days. A total of 4738 patients from 455 inpatient rehabilitation facilities were included. Twenty-three percent of the population exhibited zero onset days (n = 1103). Sixteen facilities contained zero onset patients; two facilities accounted for 97% of the zero onset subgroup. Facilities with a high frequency of zero onset day patients demonstrated significant differences in demographic, medical, and functional variables compared to the remainder of the study population. There were significantly more zero onset day admissions among burn patients (23%) than other diagnostic groups (0.5- 3.6%) in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database, but the majority (97%) came from two inpatient rehabilitation facilities. It is unexpected for patients with significant burn injury to be admitted to a rehabilitation facility on the day of injury. Future studies investigating burn rehabilitation outcomes using the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database should exclude facilities with a high percentage of zero onset days, which are not representative of the burn inpatient rehabilitation population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)666-673
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Information Systems
Rehabilitation
Incidence
Inpatients
Population
Wounds and Injuries
Datasets
Demography
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Surgery

Cite this

Schneider, J. C., Tan, W. H., Goldstein, R., Mix, J. M., Niewczyk, P., DiVita, M. A., ... Zafonte, R. (2013). Time to rehabilitation in the burn population: Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 34(6), 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827d1f52

Time to rehabilitation in the burn population : Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset. / Schneider, Jeffrey C.; Tan, Wei Han; Goldstein, Richard; Mix, Jacqueline M.; Niewczyk, Paulette; DiVita, Margaret A.; Ryan, Colleen M.; Gerrard, Paul B.; Kowalske, Karen; Zafonte, Ross.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2013, p. 666-673.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schneider, JC, Tan, WH, Goldstein, R, Mix, JM, Niewczyk, P, DiVita, MA, Ryan, CM, Gerrard, PB, Kowalske, K & Zafonte, R 2013, 'Time to rehabilitation in the burn population: Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset', Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 666-673. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827d1f52
Schneider, Jeffrey C. ; Tan, Wei Han ; Goldstein, Richard ; Mix, Jacqueline M. ; Niewczyk, Paulette ; DiVita, Margaret A. ; Ryan, Colleen M. ; Gerrard, Paul B. ; Kowalske, Karen ; Zafonte, Ross. / Time to rehabilitation in the burn population : Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 6. pp. 666-673.
@article{193f8eb3e8714c00b7dc0486087a7492,
title = "Time to rehabilitation in the burn population: Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset",
abstract = "A preliminary investigation of the burn rehabilitation population found a large variability of zero onset day frequency between facilities. Onset days is defined as the time from injury to inpatient rehabilitation admission; this variable has not been investigated in burn patients previously. This study explored if this finding was a facility-based phenomena or characteristic of burn inpatient rehabilitation patients. This study was a secondary analysis of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr{\circledR}) data from 2002 to 2007 examining inpatient rehabilitation characteristics among patients with burn injuries. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years and discharge against medical advice. Comparisons of demographic, medical and functional data were made between facilities with a high frequency of zero onset days versus facilities with a low frequency of zero onset days. A total of 4738 patients from 455 inpatient rehabilitation facilities were included. Twenty-three percent of the population exhibited zero onset days (n = 1103). Sixteen facilities contained zero onset patients; two facilities accounted for 97{\%} of the zero onset subgroup. Facilities with a high frequency of zero onset day patients demonstrated significant differences in demographic, medical, and functional variables compared to the remainder of the study population. There were significantly more zero onset day admissions among burn patients (23{\%}) than other diagnostic groups (0.5- 3.6{\%}) in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database, but the majority (97{\%}) came from two inpatient rehabilitation facilities. It is unexpected for patients with significant burn injury to be admitted to a rehabilitation facility on the day of injury. Future studies investigating burn rehabilitation outcomes using the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database should exclude facilities with a high percentage of zero onset days, which are not representative of the burn inpatient rehabilitation population.",
author = "Schneider, {Jeffrey C.} and Tan, {Wei Han} and Richard Goldstein and Mix, {Jacqueline M.} and Paulette Niewczyk and DiVita, {Margaret A.} and Ryan, {Colleen M.} and Gerrard, {Paul B.} and Karen Kowalske and Ross Zafonte",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827d1f52",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "666--673",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to rehabilitation in the burn population

T2 - Incidence of zero onset days in the UDSmr national dataset

AU - Schneider, Jeffrey C.

AU - Tan, Wei Han

AU - Goldstein, Richard

AU - Mix, Jacqueline M.

AU - Niewczyk, Paulette

AU - DiVita, Margaret A.

AU - Ryan, Colleen M.

AU - Gerrard, Paul B.

AU - Kowalske, Karen

AU - Zafonte, Ross

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A preliminary investigation of the burn rehabilitation population found a large variability of zero onset day frequency between facilities. Onset days is defined as the time from injury to inpatient rehabilitation admission; this variable has not been investigated in burn patients previously. This study explored if this finding was a facility-based phenomena or characteristic of burn inpatient rehabilitation patients. This study was a secondary analysis of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr®) data from 2002 to 2007 examining inpatient rehabilitation characteristics among patients with burn injuries. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years and discharge against medical advice. Comparisons of demographic, medical and functional data were made between facilities with a high frequency of zero onset days versus facilities with a low frequency of zero onset days. A total of 4738 patients from 455 inpatient rehabilitation facilities were included. Twenty-three percent of the population exhibited zero onset days (n = 1103). Sixteen facilities contained zero onset patients; two facilities accounted for 97% of the zero onset subgroup. Facilities with a high frequency of zero onset day patients demonstrated significant differences in demographic, medical, and functional variables compared to the remainder of the study population. There were significantly more zero onset day admissions among burn patients (23%) than other diagnostic groups (0.5- 3.6%) in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database, but the majority (97%) came from two inpatient rehabilitation facilities. It is unexpected for patients with significant burn injury to be admitted to a rehabilitation facility on the day of injury. Future studies investigating burn rehabilitation outcomes using the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database should exclude facilities with a high percentage of zero onset days, which are not representative of the burn inpatient rehabilitation population.

AB - A preliminary investigation of the burn rehabilitation population found a large variability of zero onset day frequency between facilities. Onset days is defined as the time from injury to inpatient rehabilitation admission; this variable has not been investigated in burn patients previously. This study explored if this finding was a facility-based phenomena or characteristic of burn inpatient rehabilitation patients. This study was a secondary analysis of Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation (UDSmr®) data from 2002 to 2007 examining inpatient rehabilitation characteristics among patients with burn injuries. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years and discharge against medical advice. Comparisons of demographic, medical and functional data were made between facilities with a high frequency of zero onset days versus facilities with a low frequency of zero onset days. A total of 4738 patients from 455 inpatient rehabilitation facilities were included. Twenty-three percent of the population exhibited zero onset days (n = 1103). Sixteen facilities contained zero onset patients; two facilities accounted for 97% of the zero onset subgroup. Facilities with a high frequency of zero onset day patients demonstrated significant differences in demographic, medical, and functional variables compared to the remainder of the study population. There were significantly more zero onset day admissions among burn patients (23%) than other diagnostic groups (0.5- 3.6%) in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database, but the majority (97%) came from two inpatient rehabilitation facilities. It is unexpected for patients with significant burn injury to be admitted to a rehabilitation facility on the day of injury. Future studies investigating burn rehabilitation outcomes using the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation database should exclude facilities with a high percentage of zero onset days, which are not representative of the burn inpatient rehabilitation population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892796513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892796513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827d1f52

DO - 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827d1f52

M3 - Article

C2 - 23511282

AN - SCOPUS:84892796513

VL - 34

SP - 666

EP - 673

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 6

ER -