Timing of traumatic upper extremity free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and progress report

Bridget L. Harrison, Chrisovalantis Lakhiani, Michael R. Lee, Michel Saint-Cyr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recommendations on the timing of microsurgical extremity reconstruction are as variable and numerous as the flaps described for such reconstruction. Original articles suggested that reconstruction should take place within 72 hours of injury. However, significant changes in perioperative and intraoperative management have occurred in this field, which may allow for more flexibility in the timing of reconstruction. This article aims to review current literature on timing of upper extremity reconstruction to provide the microsurgeon with up-to-date recommendations. METHODS: A structured literature search including Spanish and English language articles published between January of 1995 and December of 2011 was performed using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search strategy was conducted using groups of key words, and articles were subsequently reviewed for relevance. Bibliographies of selected articles were further reviewed for additional relevant publications. Rates of total flap loss, infection, hospital stay, and bony nonunion were recorded and analyzed according to emergent (<24 hours), early (<5 days), primary (6 to 21 days), or delayed (>21 days) reconstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. There was no significant association between timing of reconstruction and rates of flap loss, infection, or bony nonunion. Linear regression analysis displayed a significant association between length of hospital stay and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: No conclusive evidence exists to suggest that emergent, early, primary, or delayed reconstruction will eliminate or decrease complications associated with posttraumatic upper extremity reconstruction. Earlier reconstruction may decrease length of hospital stay and limit associated medical costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-596
Number of pages6
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume132
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 2013

Fingerprint

Free Tissue Flaps
Upper Extremity
Length of Stay
Bibliography
Infection
MEDLINE
Publications
Linear Models
Language
Extremities
Regression Analysis
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Timing of traumatic upper extremity free flap reconstruction : A systematic review and progress report. / Harrison, Bridget L.; Lakhiani, Chrisovalantis; Lee, Michael R.; Saint-Cyr, Michel.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 3, 17.05.2013, p. 591-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrison, Bridget L. ; Lakhiani, Chrisovalantis ; Lee, Michael R. ; Saint-Cyr, Michel. / Timing of traumatic upper extremity free flap reconstruction : A systematic review and progress report. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 132, No. 3. pp. 591-596.
@article{81f774eb2b744e1a8814b72591eb655f,
title = "Timing of traumatic upper extremity free flap reconstruction: A systematic review and progress report",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The recommendations on the timing of microsurgical extremity reconstruction are as variable and numerous as the flaps described for such reconstruction. Original articles suggested that reconstruction should take place within 72 hours of injury. However, significant changes in perioperative and intraoperative management have occurred in this field, which may allow for more flexibility in the timing of reconstruction. This article aims to review current literature on timing of upper extremity reconstruction to provide the microsurgeon with up-to-date recommendations. METHODS: A structured literature search including Spanish and English language articles published between January of 1995 and December of 2011 was performed using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search strategy was conducted using groups of key words, and articles were subsequently reviewed for relevance. Bibliographies of selected articles were further reviewed for additional relevant publications. Rates of total flap loss, infection, hospital stay, and bony nonunion were recorded and analyzed according to emergent (<24 hours), early (<5 days), primary (6 to 21 days), or delayed (>21 days) reconstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. There was no significant association between timing of reconstruction and rates of flap loss, infection, or bony nonunion. Linear regression analysis displayed a significant association between length of hospital stay and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: No conclusive evidence exists to suggest that emergent, early, primary, or delayed reconstruction will eliminate or decrease complications associated with posttraumatic upper extremity reconstruction. Earlier reconstruction may decrease length of hospital stay and limit associated medical costs.",
author = "Harrison, {Bridget L.} and Chrisovalantis Lakhiani and Lee, {Michael R.} and Michel Saint-Cyr",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "132",
pages = "591--596",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timing of traumatic upper extremity free flap reconstruction

T2 - A systematic review and progress report

AU - Harrison, Bridget L.

AU - Lakhiani, Chrisovalantis

AU - Lee, Michael R.

AU - Saint-Cyr, Michel

PY - 2013/5/17

Y1 - 2013/5/17

N2 - BACKGROUND: The recommendations on the timing of microsurgical extremity reconstruction are as variable and numerous as the flaps described for such reconstruction. Original articles suggested that reconstruction should take place within 72 hours of injury. However, significant changes in perioperative and intraoperative management have occurred in this field, which may allow for more flexibility in the timing of reconstruction. This article aims to review current literature on timing of upper extremity reconstruction to provide the microsurgeon with up-to-date recommendations. METHODS: A structured literature search including Spanish and English language articles published between January of 1995 and December of 2011 was performed using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search strategy was conducted using groups of key words, and articles were subsequently reviewed for relevance. Bibliographies of selected articles were further reviewed for additional relevant publications. Rates of total flap loss, infection, hospital stay, and bony nonunion were recorded and analyzed according to emergent (<24 hours), early (<5 days), primary (6 to 21 days), or delayed (>21 days) reconstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. There was no significant association between timing of reconstruction and rates of flap loss, infection, or bony nonunion. Linear regression analysis displayed a significant association between length of hospital stay and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: No conclusive evidence exists to suggest that emergent, early, primary, or delayed reconstruction will eliminate or decrease complications associated with posttraumatic upper extremity reconstruction. Earlier reconstruction may decrease length of hospital stay and limit associated medical costs.

AB - BACKGROUND: The recommendations on the timing of microsurgical extremity reconstruction are as variable and numerous as the flaps described for such reconstruction. Original articles suggested that reconstruction should take place within 72 hours of injury. However, significant changes in perioperative and intraoperative management have occurred in this field, which may allow for more flexibility in the timing of reconstruction. This article aims to review current literature on timing of upper extremity reconstruction to provide the microsurgeon with up-to-date recommendations. METHODS: A structured literature search including Spanish and English language articles published between January of 1995 and December of 2011 was performed using the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search strategy was conducted using groups of key words, and articles were subsequently reviewed for relevance. Bibliographies of selected articles were further reviewed for additional relevant publications. Rates of total flap loss, infection, hospital stay, and bony nonunion were recorded and analyzed according to emergent (<24 hours), early (<5 days), primary (6 to 21 days), or delayed (>21 days) reconstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen articles met inclusion criteria. There was no significant association between timing of reconstruction and rates of flap loss, infection, or bony nonunion. Linear regression analysis displayed a significant association between length of hospital stay and timing of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: No conclusive evidence exists to suggest that emergent, early, primary, or delayed reconstruction will eliminate or decrease complications associated with posttraumatic upper extremity reconstruction. Earlier reconstruction may decrease length of hospital stay and limit associated medical costs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883600639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883600639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad012

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ad012

M3 - Article

C2 - 23676968

AN - SCOPUS:84883600639

VL - 132

SP - 591

EP - 596

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 3

ER -