Trauma Stat and Trauma Minor: Are we making the call appropriately?

Li Ern Chen, Alison K. Snyder, Robert K. Minkes, Patrick A. Dillon, Robert P. Foglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Trauma accounts for a significant number of pediatric emergency room visits and is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients over 1 year of age. To provide quality care, protocols are used to mobilize personnel to treat injured patients. We reviewed our experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center, where a 2-tiered trauma activation protocol is used in treating children with significant injuries. Methods: We analyzed data in our trauma registry from 1994 to 1999 of patients with Injury Severity Score ≥ 9 in whom trauma activations were called. Data reflected demographics, severity of injury, hospital course and outcome. Trauma activations were based on standard protocols that took physiologic status, anatomic area of injury, and mechanism of injury into account. Nineteen personnel were notified in a Trauma Stat Activation, and 8 were notified in a Trauma Minor Activation. Results: There were 470 trauma activations: Trauma Stat = 220 and Trauma Minor = 250. As a group, Trauma Stat patients were more hemodynamically unstable, had a lower GCS and a higher Injury Severity Score than Trauma Minor patients. Patients in the Trauma Stat group were also more likely to require intensive care and have a prolonged hospitalization. The Trauma Stat group had a mortality rate of 20%. There were no deaths in the Trauma Minor group. Conclusions: Trauma activations result in heavy resource utilization and must be appropriate. The 2 trauma activation levels were associated with differences in injury severity, medical resource utilization, and outcome. With no deaths in the Trauma Minor group and a 20% mortality rate in the Trauma Stat group, we conclude that the protocol used was neither too conservative, nor too liberal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-425
Number of pages5
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Pediatrics
Mortality
Quality of Health Care
Trauma Centers
Critical Care
Registries
Hospital Emergency Service
Cause of Death
Hospitalization
Demography

Keywords

  • Activation
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Trauma Stat and Trauma Minor : Are we making the call appropriately? / Chen, Li Ern; Snyder, Alison K.; Minkes, Robert K.; Dillon, Patrick A.; Foglia, Robert P.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 20, No. 7, 07.2004, p. 421-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, Li Ern ; Snyder, Alison K. ; Minkes, Robert K. ; Dillon, Patrick A. ; Foglia, Robert P. / Trauma Stat and Trauma Minor : Are we making the call appropriately?. In: Pediatric Emergency Care. 2004 ; Vol. 20, No. 7. pp. 421-425.
@article{47b00a65d3f940308fd835c71cbaa283,
title = "Trauma Stat and Trauma Minor: Are we making the call appropriately?",
abstract = "Objectives: Trauma accounts for a significant number of pediatric emergency room visits and is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients over 1 year of age. To provide quality care, protocols are used to mobilize personnel to treat injured patients. We reviewed our experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center, where a 2-tiered trauma activation protocol is used in treating children with significant injuries. Methods: We analyzed data in our trauma registry from 1994 to 1999 of patients with Injury Severity Score ≥ 9 in whom trauma activations were called. Data reflected demographics, severity of injury, hospital course and outcome. Trauma activations were based on standard protocols that took physiologic status, anatomic area of injury, and mechanism of injury into account. Nineteen personnel were notified in a Trauma Stat Activation, and 8 were notified in a Trauma Minor Activation. Results: There were 470 trauma activations: Trauma Stat = 220 and Trauma Minor = 250. As a group, Trauma Stat patients were more hemodynamically unstable, had a lower GCS and a higher Injury Severity Score than Trauma Minor patients. Patients in the Trauma Stat group were also more likely to require intensive care and have a prolonged hospitalization. The Trauma Stat group had a mortality rate of 20{\%}. There were no deaths in the Trauma Minor group. Conclusions: Trauma activations result in heavy resource utilization and must be appropriate. The 2 trauma activation levels were associated with differences in injury severity, medical resource utilization, and outcome. With no deaths in the Trauma Minor group and a 20{\%} mortality rate in the Trauma Stat group, we conclude that the protocol used was neither too conservative, nor too liberal.",
keywords = "Activation, Trauma",
author = "Chen, {Li Ern} and Snyder, {Alison K.} and Minkes, {Robert K.} and Dillon, {Patrick A.} and Foglia, {Robert P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.pec.0000132213.19858.bf",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "421--425",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trauma Stat and Trauma Minor

T2 - Are we making the call appropriately?

AU - Chen, Li Ern

AU - Snyder, Alison K.

AU - Minkes, Robert K.

AU - Dillon, Patrick A.

AU - Foglia, Robert P.

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Objectives: Trauma accounts for a significant number of pediatric emergency room visits and is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients over 1 year of age. To provide quality care, protocols are used to mobilize personnel to treat injured patients. We reviewed our experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center, where a 2-tiered trauma activation protocol is used in treating children with significant injuries. Methods: We analyzed data in our trauma registry from 1994 to 1999 of patients with Injury Severity Score ≥ 9 in whom trauma activations were called. Data reflected demographics, severity of injury, hospital course and outcome. Trauma activations were based on standard protocols that took physiologic status, anatomic area of injury, and mechanism of injury into account. Nineteen personnel were notified in a Trauma Stat Activation, and 8 were notified in a Trauma Minor Activation. Results: There were 470 trauma activations: Trauma Stat = 220 and Trauma Minor = 250. As a group, Trauma Stat patients were more hemodynamically unstable, had a lower GCS and a higher Injury Severity Score than Trauma Minor patients. Patients in the Trauma Stat group were also more likely to require intensive care and have a prolonged hospitalization. The Trauma Stat group had a mortality rate of 20%. There were no deaths in the Trauma Minor group. Conclusions: Trauma activations result in heavy resource utilization and must be appropriate. The 2 trauma activation levels were associated with differences in injury severity, medical resource utilization, and outcome. With no deaths in the Trauma Minor group and a 20% mortality rate in the Trauma Stat group, we conclude that the protocol used was neither too conservative, nor too liberal.

AB - Objectives: Trauma accounts for a significant number of pediatric emergency room visits and is the leading cause of death in pediatric patients over 1 year of age. To provide quality care, protocols are used to mobilize personnel to treat injured patients. We reviewed our experience at a level 1 pediatric trauma center, where a 2-tiered trauma activation protocol is used in treating children with significant injuries. Methods: We analyzed data in our trauma registry from 1994 to 1999 of patients with Injury Severity Score ≥ 9 in whom trauma activations were called. Data reflected demographics, severity of injury, hospital course and outcome. Trauma activations were based on standard protocols that took physiologic status, anatomic area of injury, and mechanism of injury into account. Nineteen personnel were notified in a Trauma Stat Activation, and 8 were notified in a Trauma Minor Activation. Results: There were 470 trauma activations: Trauma Stat = 220 and Trauma Minor = 250. As a group, Trauma Stat patients were more hemodynamically unstable, had a lower GCS and a higher Injury Severity Score than Trauma Minor patients. Patients in the Trauma Stat group were also more likely to require intensive care and have a prolonged hospitalization. The Trauma Stat group had a mortality rate of 20%. There were no deaths in the Trauma Minor group. Conclusions: Trauma activations result in heavy resource utilization and must be appropriate. The 2 trauma activation levels were associated with differences in injury severity, medical resource utilization, and outcome. With no deaths in the Trauma Minor group and a 20% mortality rate in the Trauma Stat group, we conclude that the protocol used was neither too conservative, nor too liberal.

KW - Activation

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242695016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242695016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pec.0000132213.19858.bf

DO - 10.1097/01.pec.0000132213.19858.bf

M3 - Article

C2 - 15232239

AN - SCOPUS:3242695016

VL - 20

SP - 421

EP - 425

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 7

ER -