Treatment options for venous leg ulcers: Effectiveness of vascular surgery, bioengineered tissue, and electrical stimulation

Gaurav Thakral, Javier La Fontaine, Paul Kim, Bijan Najafi, Adam Nichols, Lawrence A. Lavery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the peer-reviewed literature that compares advanced venous leg ulcer therapies to standard of care with compression dressings. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for venous ulcer treatment with electrical stimulation, surgical vein correction, and bioengineered tissues was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing advanced treatment with standard of care using compression dressing were included. A total of 7 bioengineered tissue, 4 surgical treatment, and 4 electrical stimulation randomized clinical trials were identified. RESULTS: Compared with nonstandard treatments, electrical stimulation demonstrated improved wound healing, fewer adverse events, and shorter duration of healing. Healing rates at the end of the study were greater for surgical intervention, followed by similar outcomes for electrical stimulation and bioengineered tissues. Studies involving bioengineered tissues and surgical venous ablation demonstrated inconsistent/inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of electrical stimulation in venous ulcer management has not been fully explored. Further studies of dosing electrical stimulation therapy may reveal therapeutic and preventive benefits for managing venous ulcers not yet elucidated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)164-172
Number of pages9
JournalAdvances in Skin and Wound Care
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 27 2015

Fingerprint

Varicose Ulcer
Leg Ulcer
Electric Stimulation
Blood Vessels
Bandages
Standard of Care
Therapeutics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Electric Stimulation Therapy
MEDLINE
Wound Healing
Veins

Keywords

  • Bioengineered tissue
  • Edema
  • Electrical stimulation
  • Surgery
  • Venous leg ulcer
  • Wound healing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Dermatology

Cite this

Treatment options for venous leg ulcers : Effectiveness of vascular surgery, bioengineered tissue, and electrical stimulation. / Thakral, Gaurav; La Fontaine, Javier; Kim, Paul; Najafi, Bijan; Nichols, Adam; Lavery, Lawrence A.

In: Advances in Skin and Wound Care, Vol. 28, No. 4, 27.04.2015, p. 164-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f47510bcb004dae9d8f53b675c96885,
title = "Treatment options for venous leg ulcers: Effectiveness of vascular surgery, bioengineered tissue, and electrical stimulation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the peer-reviewed literature that compares advanced venous leg ulcer therapies to standard of care with compression dressings. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for venous ulcer treatment with electrical stimulation, surgical vein correction, and bioengineered tissues was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing advanced treatment with standard of care using compression dressing were included. A total of 7 bioengineered tissue, 4 surgical treatment, and 4 electrical stimulation randomized clinical trials were identified. RESULTS: Compared with nonstandard treatments, electrical stimulation demonstrated improved wound healing, fewer adverse events, and shorter duration of healing. Healing rates at the end of the study were greater for surgical intervention, followed by similar outcomes for electrical stimulation and bioengineered tissues. Studies involving bioengineered tissues and surgical venous ablation demonstrated inconsistent/inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of electrical stimulation in venous ulcer management has not been fully explored. Further studies of dosing electrical stimulation therapy may reveal therapeutic and preventive benefits for managing venous ulcers not yet elucidated.",
keywords = "Bioengineered tissue, Edema, Electrical stimulation, Surgery, Venous leg ulcer, Wound healing",
author = "Gaurav Thakral and {La Fontaine}, Javier and Paul Kim and Bijan Najafi and Adam Nichols and Lavery, {Lawrence A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1097/01.ASW.0000462328.60670.c3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "164--172",
journal = "Advances in Skin and Wound Care",
issn = "1527-7941",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment options for venous leg ulcers

T2 - Effectiveness of vascular surgery, bioengineered tissue, and electrical stimulation

AU - Thakral, Gaurav

AU - La Fontaine, Javier

AU - Kim, Paul

AU - Najafi, Bijan

AU - Nichols, Adam

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

PY - 2015/4/27

Y1 - 2015/4/27

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the peer-reviewed literature that compares advanced venous leg ulcer therapies to standard of care with compression dressings. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for venous ulcer treatment with electrical stimulation, surgical vein correction, and bioengineered tissues was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing advanced treatment with standard of care using compression dressing were included. A total of 7 bioengineered tissue, 4 surgical treatment, and 4 electrical stimulation randomized clinical trials were identified. RESULTS: Compared with nonstandard treatments, electrical stimulation demonstrated improved wound healing, fewer adverse events, and shorter duration of healing. Healing rates at the end of the study were greater for surgical intervention, followed by similar outcomes for electrical stimulation and bioengineered tissues. Studies involving bioengineered tissues and surgical venous ablation demonstrated inconsistent/inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of electrical stimulation in venous ulcer management has not been fully explored. Further studies of dosing electrical stimulation therapy may reveal therapeutic and preventive benefits for managing venous ulcers not yet elucidated.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the peer-reviewed literature that compares advanced venous leg ulcer therapies to standard of care with compression dressings. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for venous ulcer treatment with electrical stimulation, surgical vein correction, and bioengineered tissues was conducted. Randomized clinical trials comparing advanced treatment with standard of care using compression dressing were included. A total of 7 bioengineered tissue, 4 surgical treatment, and 4 electrical stimulation randomized clinical trials were identified. RESULTS: Compared with nonstandard treatments, electrical stimulation demonstrated improved wound healing, fewer adverse events, and shorter duration of healing. Healing rates at the end of the study were greater for surgical intervention, followed by similar outcomes for electrical stimulation and bioengineered tissues. Studies involving bioengineered tissues and surgical venous ablation demonstrated inconsistent/inconclusive results. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of electrical stimulation in venous ulcer management has not been fully explored. Further studies of dosing electrical stimulation therapy may reveal therapeutic and preventive benefits for managing venous ulcers not yet elucidated.

KW - Bioengineered tissue

KW - Edema

KW - Electrical stimulation

KW - Surgery

KW - Venous leg ulcer

KW - Wound healing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925791363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925791363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ASW.0000462328.60670.c3

DO - 10.1097/01.ASW.0000462328.60670.c3

M3 - Article

C2 - 25775200

AN - SCOPUS:84925791363

VL - 28

SP - 164

EP - 172

JO - Advances in Skin and Wound Care

JF - Advances in Skin and Wound Care

SN - 1527-7941

IS - 4

ER -