Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break

Wael Shamseddeen, Gregory Clarke, Karen Dineen Wagner, Neal D. Ryan, Boris Birmaher, Graham Emslie, Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow, Giovanna Porta, Taryn Mayes, Martin B. Keller, David A. Brent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: There is little work on the effect of school on response to treatment of depression, with available research suggesting that children and adolescents with school difficulties are less likely to respond to fluoxetine compared with those with no school difficulties. Method: Depressed adolescents in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents study, who had not responded to a previous adequate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial, were randomly assigned to one of the following: another SSRI, venlafaxine, another SSRI + cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or venlafaxine + CBT. Participants were classified into four groups depending on whether their enrollment in the study and end of treatment was during school or summer vacation. Results: Controlling for baseline differences, adolescents ending their 12-week treatment during summer vacation had odds 1.7 times (95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.8, p = .04) greater to have an adequate response as those ending their treatment while being in school. In addition, adequate depression response was associated with fewer school problems at week 12 (scores <5 versus scores <5: odds ratio = 3.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-5.8, p < .001). There was a significant interaction between school difficulties and timing of treatment, with the lowest rates of response being among adolescents having school difficulties and ending their treatment during the active school year. Conclusion: School problems are relevant to treatment response in depressed adolescents and should be incorporated into the treatment plan. These findings also suggest that the time of the year might need to be taken into consideration for analysis of clinical trials in school-aged youth. Clinical trial registration information--Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00018902.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1140-1148
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume50
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Therapeutics
Cognitive Therapy
Depression
Clinical Trials
Confidence Intervals
Treatment-Resistant Depressive Disorder
Fluoxetine
Odds Ratio
Research
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

Keywords

  • adolescent depression
  • school problems
  • therapy
  • time variation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break. / Shamseddeen, Wael; Clarke, Gregory; Wagner, Karen Dineen; Ryan, Neal D.; Birmaher, Boris; Emslie, Graham; Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum; Porta, Giovanna; Mayes, Taryn; Keller, Martin B.; Brent, David A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 50, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 1140-1148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shamseddeen, W, Clarke, G, Wagner, KD, Ryan, ND, Birmaher, B, Emslie, G, Asarnow, JR, Porta, G, Mayes, T, Keller, MB & Brent, DA 2011, 'Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break', Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1140-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.022
Shamseddeen, Wael ; Clarke, Gregory ; Wagner, Karen Dineen ; Ryan, Neal D. ; Birmaher, Boris ; Emslie, Graham ; Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum ; Porta, Giovanna ; Mayes, Taryn ; Keller, Martin B. ; Brent, David A. / Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2011 ; Vol. 50, No. 11. pp. 1140-1148.
@article{7c55a2ef9d6340cc8ae432aac79cb98f,
title = "Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break",
abstract = "Objective: There is little work on the effect of school on response to treatment of depression, with available research suggesting that children and adolescents with school difficulties are less likely to respond to fluoxetine compared with those with no school difficulties. Method: Depressed adolescents in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents study, who had not responded to a previous adequate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial, were randomly assigned to one of the following: another SSRI, venlafaxine, another SSRI + cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or venlafaxine + CBT. Participants were classified into four groups depending on whether their enrollment in the study and end of treatment was during school or summer vacation. Results: Controlling for baseline differences, adolescents ending their 12-week treatment during summer vacation had odds 1.7 times (95{\%} confidence interval = 1.02-2.8, p = .04) greater to have an adequate response as those ending their treatment while being in school. In addition, adequate depression response was associated with fewer school problems at week 12 (scores <5 versus scores <5: odds ratio = 3.3, 95{\%} confidence interval = 1.9-5.8, p < .001). There was a significant interaction between school difficulties and timing of treatment, with the lowest rates of response being among adolescents having school difficulties and ending their treatment during the active school year. Conclusion: School problems are relevant to treatment response in depressed adolescents and should be incorporated into the treatment plan. These findings also suggest that the time of the year might need to be taken into consideration for analysis of clinical trials in school-aged youth. Clinical trial registration information--Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00018902.",
keywords = "adolescent depression, school problems, therapy, time variation",
author = "Wael Shamseddeen and Gregory Clarke and Wagner, {Karen Dineen} and Ryan, {Neal D.} and Boris Birmaher and Graham Emslie and Asarnow, {Joan Rosenbaum} and Giovanna Porta and Taryn Mayes and Keller, {Martin B.} and Brent, {David A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "1140--1148",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment-resistant depressed youth show a higher response rate if treatment ends during summer school break

AU - Shamseddeen, Wael

AU - Clarke, Gregory

AU - Wagner, Karen Dineen

AU - Ryan, Neal D.

AU - Birmaher, Boris

AU - Emslie, Graham

AU - Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum

AU - Porta, Giovanna

AU - Mayes, Taryn

AU - Keller, Martin B.

AU - Brent, David A.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objective: There is little work on the effect of school on response to treatment of depression, with available research suggesting that children and adolescents with school difficulties are less likely to respond to fluoxetine compared with those with no school difficulties. Method: Depressed adolescents in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents study, who had not responded to a previous adequate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial, were randomly assigned to one of the following: another SSRI, venlafaxine, another SSRI + cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or venlafaxine + CBT. Participants were classified into four groups depending on whether their enrollment in the study and end of treatment was during school or summer vacation. Results: Controlling for baseline differences, adolescents ending their 12-week treatment during summer vacation had odds 1.7 times (95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.8, p = .04) greater to have an adequate response as those ending their treatment while being in school. In addition, adequate depression response was associated with fewer school problems at week 12 (scores <5 versus scores <5: odds ratio = 3.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-5.8, p < .001). There was a significant interaction between school difficulties and timing of treatment, with the lowest rates of response being among adolescents having school difficulties and ending their treatment during the active school year. Conclusion: School problems are relevant to treatment response in depressed adolescents and should be incorporated into the treatment plan. These findings also suggest that the time of the year might need to be taken into consideration for analysis of clinical trials in school-aged youth. Clinical trial registration information--Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00018902.

AB - Objective: There is little work on the effect of school on response to treatment of depression, with available research suggesting that children and adolescents with school difficulties are less likely to respond to fluoxetine compared with those with no school difficulties. Method: Depressed adolescents in the Treatment of Resistant Depression in Adolescents study, who had not responded to a previous adequate selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial, were randomly assigned to one of the following: another SSRI, venlafaxine, another SSRI + cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), or venlafaxine + CBT. Participants were classified into four groups depending on whether their enrollment in the study and end of treatment was during school or summer vacation. Results: Controlling for baseline differences, adolescents ending their 12-week treatment during summer vacation had odds 1.7 times (95% confidence interval = 1.02-2.8, p = .04) greater to have an adequate response as those ending their treatment while being in school. In addition, adequate depression response was associated with fewer school problems at week 12 (scores <5 versus scores <5: odds ratio = 3.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.9-5.8, p < .001). There was a significant interaction between school difficulties and timing of treatment, with the lowest rates of response being among adolescents having school difficulties and ending their treatment during the active school year. Conclusion: School problems are relevant to treatment response in depressed adolescents and should be incorporated into the treatment plan. These findings also suggest that the time of the year might need to be taken into consideration for analysis of clinical trials in school-aged youth. Clinical trial registration information--Treatment of SSRI-Resistant Depression in Adolescents (TORDIA); http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00018902.

KW - adolescent depression

KW - school problems

KW - therapy

KW - time variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054862465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054862465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.022

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 1140

EP - 1148

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 11

ER -