Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: A survey of primary care providers

Anil N. Makam, Holly J. Lanham, Kim Batchelor, Lipika Samal, Brett Moran, Temple Howell-Stampley, Lynne Kirk, Manjula Cherukuri, Noel Santini, Luci K. Leykum, Ethan A. Halm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria. Methods. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) in 11 general internal medicine and family medicine practices affiliated with 3 health systems in Texas about their use and satisfaction with performing common tasks (documentation, medication prescribing, preventive services, problem list) in the Epic EHR, a common commercial system. Most practices had greater than 5 years of experience with the Epic EHR. We used multivariate logistic regression to model predictors of being a structured documenter, defined as using electronic templates or prepopulated dot phrases to document at least two of the three note sections (history, physical, assessment and plan). Results: 146 PCPs responded (70%). The majority used free text to document the history (51%) and assessment and plan (54%) and electronic templates to document the physical exam (57%). Half of PCPs were structured documenters (55%) with family medicine specialty (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.4-7.8) and years since graduation (nonlinear relationship with youngest and oldest having lowest probabilities) being significant predictors. Nearly half (43%) reported spending at least one extra hour beyond each scheduled half-day clinic completing EHR documentation. Three-quarters were satisfied with documenting completion of pneumococcal vaccinations and half were satisfied with documenting cancer screening (57% for breast, 45% for colorectal, and 46% for cervical). Fewer were satisfied with reminders for overdue pneumococcal vaccination (48%) and cancer screening (38% for breast, 37% for colorectal, and 31% for cervical). While most believed the problem list was helpful (70%) and kept an up-to-date list for their patients (68%), half thought they were unreliable and inaccurate (51%). Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with and suboptimal use of key functions of the EHR may mitigate the potential for EHR use to improve preventive health and chronic disease management. Future work should optimize use of key functions and improve providers' time efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number86
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Primary Health Care
Early Detection of Cancer
Documentation
Vaccination
Breast
History
Medicine
Family Practice
Health
Internal Medicine
Disease Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Motivation
Chronic Disease
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Attitude of health personnel
  • Attitude to computers
  • Efficiency
  • Electronic health record (EHR)
  • Medical informatics/ utilization
  • Primary care
  • Quality of care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record : A survey of primary care providers. / Makam, Anil N.; Lanham, Holly J.; Batchelor, Kim; Samal, Lipika; Moran, Brett; Howell-Stampley, Temple; Kirk, Lynne; Cherukuri, Manjula; Santini, Noel; Leykum, Luci K.; Halm, Ethan A.

In: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 13, No. 1, 86, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0137c76b3a240cc9c46014b03e07df3,
title = "Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: A survey of primary care providers",
abstract = "Background: Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet {"}meaningful use{"} criteria. Methods. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) in 11 general internal medicine and family medicine practices affiliated with 3 health systems in Texas about their use and satisfaction with performing common tasks (documentation, medication prescribing, preventive services, problem list) in the Epic EHR, a common commercial system. Most practices had greater than 5 years of experience with the Epic EHR. We used multivariate logistic regression to model predictors of being a structured documenter, defined as using electronic templates or prepopulated dot phrases to document at least two of the three note sections (history, physical, assessment and plan). Results: 146 PCPs responded (70{\%}). The majority used free text to document the history (51{\%}) and assessment and plan (54{\%}) and electronic templates to document the physical exam (57{\%}). Half of PCPs were structured documenters (55{\%}) with family medicine specialty (adjusted OR 3.3, 95{\%} CI, 1.4-7.8) and years since graduation (nonlinear relationship with youngest and oldest having lowest probabilities) being significant predictors. Nearly half (43{\%}) reported spending at least one extra hour beyond each scheduled half-day clinic completing EHR documentation. Three-quarters were satisfied with documenting completion of pneumococcal vaccinations and half were satisfied with documenting cancer screening (57{\%} for breast, 45{\%} for colorectal, and 46{\%} for cervical). Fewer were satisfied with reminders for overdue pneumococcal vaccination (48{\%}) and cancer screening (38{\%} for breast, 37{\%} for colorectal, and 31{\%} for cervical). While most believed the problem list was helpful (70{\%}) and kept an up-to-date list for their patients (68{\%}), half thought they were unreliable and inaccurate (51{\%}). Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with and suboptimal use of key functions of the EHR may mitigate the potential for EHR use to improve preventive health and chronic disease management. Future work should optimize use of key functions and improve providers' time efficiency.",
keywords = "Attitude of health personnel, Attitude to computers, Efficiency, Electronic health record (EHR), Medical informatics/ utilization, Primary care, Quality of care",
author = "Makam, {Anil N.} and Lanham, {Holly J.} and Kim Batchelor and Lipika Samal and Brett Moran and Temple Howell-Stampley and Lynne Kirk and Manjula Cherukuri and Noel Santini and Leykum, {Luci K.} and Halm, {Ethan A.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6947-13-86",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making",
issn = "1472-6947",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record

T2 - A survey of primary care providers

AU - Makam, Anil N.

AU - Lanham, Holly J.

AU - Batchelor, Kim

AU - Samal, Lipika

AU - Moran, Brett

AU - Howell-Stampley, Temple

AU - Kirk, Lynne

AU - Cherukuri, Manjula

AU - Santini, Noel

AU - Leykum, Luci K.

AU - Halm, Ethan A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria. Methods. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) in 11 general internal medicine and family medicine practices affiliated with 3 health systems in Texas about their use and satisfaction with performing common tasks (documentation, medication prescribing, preventive services, problem list) in the Epic EHR, a common commercial system. Most practices had greater than 5 years of experience with the Epic EHR. We used multivariate logistic regression to model predictors of being a structured documenter, defined as using electronic templates or prepopulated dot phrases to document at least two of the three note sections (history, physical, assessment and plan). Results: 146 PCPs responded (70%). The majority used free text to document the history (51%) and assessment and plan (54%) and electronic templates to document the physical exam (57%). Half of PCPs were structured documenters (55%) with family medicine specialty (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.4-7.8) and years since graduation (nonlinear relationship with youngest and oldest having lowest probabilities) being significant predictors. Nearly half (43%) reported spending at least one extra hour beyond each scheduled half-day clinic completing EHR documentation. Three-quarters were satisfied with documenting completion of pneumococcal vaccinations and half were satisfied with documenting cancer screening (57% for breast, 45% for colorectal, and 46% for cervical). Fewer were satisfied with reminders for overdue pneumococcal vaccination (48%) and cancer screening (38% for breast, 37% for colorectal, and 31% for cervical). While most believed the problem list was helpful (70%) and kept an up-to-date list for their patients (68%), half thought they were unreliable and inaccurate (51%). Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with and suboptimal use of key functions of the EHR may mitigate the potential for EHR use to improve preventive health and chronic disease management. Future work should optimize use of key functions and improve providers' time efficiency.

AB - Background: Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria. Methods. We surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) in 11 general internal medicine and family medicine practices affiliated with 3 health systems in Texas about their use and satisfaction with performing common tasks (documentation, medication prescribing, preventive services, problem list) in the Epic EHR, a common commercial system. Most practices had greater than 5 years of experience with the Epic EHR. We used multivariate logistic regression to model predictors of being a structured documenter, defined as using electronic templates or prepopulated dot phrases to document at least two of the three note sections (history, physical, assessment and plan). Results: 146 PCPs responded (70%). The majority used free text to document the history (51%) and assessment and plan (54%) and electronic templates to document the physical exam (57%). Half of PCPs were structured documenters (55%) with family medicine specialty (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.4-7.8) and years since graduation (nonlinear relationship with youngest and oldest having lowest probabilities) being significant predictors. Nearly half (43%) reported spending at least one extra hour beyond each scheduled half-day clinic completing EHR documentation. Three-quarters were satisfied with documenting completion of pneumococcal vaccinations and half were satisfied with documenting cancer screening (57% for breast, 45% for colorectal, and 46% for cervical). Fewer were satisfied with reminders for overdue pneumococcal vaccination (48%) and cancer screening (38% for breast, 37% for colorectal, and 31% for cervical). While most believed the problem list was helpful (70%) and kept an up-to-date list for their patients (68%), half thought they were unreliable and inaccurate (51%). Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with and suboptimal use of key functions of the EHR may mitigate the potential for EHR use to improve preventive health and chronic disease management. Future work should optimize use of key functions and improve providers' time efficiency.

KW - Attitude of health personnel

KW - Attitude to computers

KW - Efficiency

KW - Electronic health record (EHR)

KW - Medical informatics/ utilization

KW - Primary care

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881155362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881155362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86

DO - 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86

M3 - Article

C2 - 24070335

AN - SCOPUS:84881155362

VL - 13

JO - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

JF - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

SN - 1472-6947

IS - 1

M1 - 86

ER -