Uses and limitations of simulated patients in psychiatric education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The use of standardized patients (SPs) is becoming prominent as a learning and evaluation tool in both undergraduate and graduate medical education. As increasing attempts are made to extend this tool to psychiatric training and education, it has been suggested that SPs can be useful not only to expose students to the variety of psychopathologic states, but also to teach and assess complex interpersonal processes such as em-pathic engagement and psychodynamic psychotherapy. The author argues that current enthusiasm for this modality should be tempered with caution about its limitations. Methods: Current uses of SPs in psychiatry as described in the psychiatric education and general medical education literature are critically reviewed. Results: Inherent problems in the use of SPs in psychiatry are described as they relate to the nature of empathy and the uniquely interpersonal nature of psychiatry. Conclusion: SPs are useful additions to our educational toolbox but have intrinsic limitations for our field due to psychiatry's roots in the nature of empathy and the patient-psychiatrist relationship. Standardized patients are most appropriate for exposing trainees to a variety of psychopathologies and testing very discrete skills; the use of SPs is most problematic for teaching psychotherapy and assessing complex interpersonal skills, such as em-pathic responsiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-119
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

psychiatry
Psychiatry
Education
psychotherapy
empathy
education
psychopathology
psychiatrist
trainee
graduate
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Undergraduate Medical Education
Graduate Medical Education
Teaching
Medical Education
Psychopathology
evaluation
Psychotherapy
learning
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education

Cite this

Uses and limitations of simulated patients in psychiatric education. / Brenner, Adam M.

In: Academic Psychiatry, Vol. 33, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 112-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87432e87ee40470e8a4385b5a9b33d4b,
title = "Uses and limitations of simulated patients in psychiatric education",
abstract = "Objectives: The use of standardized patients (SPs) is becoming prominent as a learning and evaluation tool in both undergraduate and graduate medical education. As increasing attempts are made to extend this tool to psychiatric training and education, it has been suggested that SPs can be useful not only to expose students to the variety of psychopathologic states, but also to teach and assess complex interpersonal processes such as em-pathic engagement and psychodynamic psychotherapy. The author argues that current enthusiasm for this modality should be tempered with caution about its limitations. Methods: Current uses of SPs in psychiatry as described in the psychiatric education and general medical education literature are critically reviewed. Results: Inherent problems in the use of SPs in psychiatry are described as they relate to the nature of empathy and the uniquely interpersonal nature of psychiatry. Conclusion: SPs are useful additions to our educational toolbox but have intrinsic limitations for our field due to psychiatry's roots in the nature of empathy and the patient-psychiatrist relationship. Standardized patients are most appropriate for exposing trainees to a variety of psychopathologies and testing very discrete skills; the use of SPs is most problematic for teaching psychotherapy and assessing complex interpersonal skills, such as em-pathic responsiveness.",
author = "Brenner, {Adam M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ap.33.2.112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "112--119",
journal = "Academic Psychiatry",
issn = "1042-9670",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uses and limitations of simulated patients in psychiatric education

AU - Brenner, Adam M.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Objectives: The use of standardized patients (SPs) is becoming prominent as a learning and evaluation tool in both undergraduate and graduate medical education. As increasing attempts are made to extend this tool to psychiatric training and education, it has been suggested that SPs can be useful not only to expose students to the variety of psychopathologic states, but also to teach and assess complex interpersonal processes such as em-pathic engagement and psychodynamic psychotherapy. The author argues that current enthusiasm for this modality should be tempered with caution about its limitations. Methods: Current uses of SPs in psychiatry as described in the psychiatric education and general medical education literature are critically reviewed. Results: Inherent problems in the use of SPs in psychiatry are described as they relate to the nature of empathy and the uniquely interpersonal nature of psychiatry. Conclusion: SPs are useful additions to our educational toolbox but have intrinsic limitations for our field due to psychiatry's roots in the nature of empathy and the patient-psychiatrist relationship. Standardized patients are most appropriate for exposing trainees to a variety of psychopathologies and testing very discrete skills; the use of SPs is most problematic for teaching psychotherapy and assessing complex interpersonal skills, such as em-pathic responsiveness.

AB - Objectives: The use of standardized patients (SPs) is becoming prominent as a learning and evaluation tool in both undergraduate and graduate medical education. As increasing attempts are made to extend this tool to psychiatric training and education, it has been suggested that SPs can be useful not only to expose students to the variety of psychopathologic states, but also to teach and assess complex interpersonal processes such as em-pathic engagement and psychodynamic psychotherapy. The author argues that current enthusiasm for this modality should be tempered with caution about its limitations. Methods: Current uses of SPs in psychiatry as described in the psychiatric education and general medical education literature are critically reviewed. Results: Inherent problems in the use of SPs in psychiatry are described as they relate to the nature of empathy and the uniquely interpersonal nature of psychiatry. Conclusion: SPs are useful additions to our educational toolbox but have intrinsic limitations for our field due to psychiatry's roots in the nature of empathy and the patient-psychiatrist relationship. Standardized patients are most appropriate for exposing trainees to a variety of psychopathologies and testing very discrete skills; the use of SPs is most problematic for teaching psychotherapy and assessing complex interpersonal skills, such as em-pathic responsiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65649114755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65649114755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ap.33.2.112

DO - 10.1176/appi.ap.33.2.112

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 112

EP - 119

JO - Academic Psychiatry

JF - Academic Psychiatry

SN - 1042-9670

IS - 2

ER -