Uterine Preservation vs Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Clinical Practice Guidelines

Kate V. Meriwether, Danielle D. Antosh, Cedric K. Olivera, Shunaha Kim-Fine, Ethan M. Balk, Miles Murphy, Cara L. Grimes, Ambereen Sleemi, Ruchira Singh, Alexis A. DIeter, Catrina C. Crisp, David D Rahn

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-681
Number of pages2
JournalObstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume73
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Meriwether, K. V., Antosh, D. D., Olivera, C. K., Kim-Fine, S., Balk, E. M., Murphy, M., Grimes, C. L., Sleemi, A., Singh, R., DIeter, A. A., Crisp, C. C., & Rahn, D. D. (2018). Uterine Preservation vs Hysterectomy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Clinical Practice Guidelines. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 73(12), 680-681. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000628