Utilization and yield of the ocular microbiology laboratory in the diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis

J. W. Norbury, M. Vogel, R. E. Silvany, James P McCulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose. With the advent of readily available broad spectrum topical antibiotics, ophthalmologists may be less inclined to perform corneal smears and cultures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic capability and utilization of a university-based ocular microbiology laboratory. Methods. A retrospective review was performed examining 164 consecutive corneal cultures performed on patients with visually threatening keratitis submitted to our ocular microbiology laboratory from October 1994 through October 1995. Results. Seventy-five isolates were obtained with 6% of eyes (10/164) yielding multiple organisms. 42% of cultures were positive (69/164). There were 52 bacterial organisms, 16 fungal organisms and 7 parasitic organisms recovered. All isolates were examined by our ocular microbiologist, who was able to correctly identify 12% (9/75) of organisms with gram and giemsa staining alone. Conclusions. The ocular microbiologist remains an important consultant for the proper diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis. The low diagnostic yield of gram and giemsa staining suggest that smears alone are not sufficient. As ophthalmologists, we should concentrate our efforts on better specimen collection and organism identification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume37
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 15 1996

Fingerprint

Keratitis
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Microbiology
Staining and Labeling
Specimen Handling
Consultants
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Ophthalmologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Utilization and yield of the ocular microbiology laboratory in the diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis. / Norbury, J. W.; Vogel, M.; Silvany, R. E.; McCulley, James P.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 15.02.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e17bd9a140754c409ed930cc2f56850f,
title = "Utilization and yield of the ocular microbiology laboratory in the diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis",
abstract = "Purpose. With the advent of readily available broad spectrum topical antibiotics, ophthalmologists may be less inclined to perform corneal smears and cultures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic capability and utilization of a university-based ocular microbiology laboratory. Methods. A retrospective review was performed examining 164 consecutive corneal cultures performed on patients with visually threatening keratitis submitted to our ocular microbiology laboratory from October 1994 through October 1995. Results. Seventy-five isolates were obtained with 6{\%} of eyes (10/164) yielding multiple organisms. 42{\%} of cultures were positive (69/164). There were 52 bacterial organisms, 16 fungal organisms and 7 parasitic organisms recovered. All isolates were examined by our ocular microbiologist, who was able to correctly identify 12{\%} (9/75) of organisms with gram and giemsa staining alone. Conclusions. The ocular microbiologist remains an important consultant for the proper diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis. The low diagnostic yield of gram and giemsa staining suggest that smears alone are not sufficient. As ophthalmologists, we should concentrate our efforts on better specimen collection and organism identification.",
author = "Norbury, {J. W.} and M. Vogel and Silvany, {R. E.} and McCulley, {James P}",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilization and yield of the ocular microbiology laboratory in the diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis

AU - Norbury, J. W.

AU - Vogel, M.

AU - Silvany, R. E.

AU - McCulley, James P

PY - 1996/2/15

Y1 - 1996/2/15

N2 - Purpose. With the advent of readily available broad spectrum topical antibiotics, ophthalmologists may be less inclined to perform corneal smears and cultures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic capability and utilization of a university-based ocular microbiology laboratory. Methods. A retrospective review was performed examining 164 consecutive corneal cultures performed on patients with visually threatening keratitis submitted to our ocular microbiology laboratory from October 1994 through October 1995. Results. Seventy-five isolates were obtained with 6% of eyes (10/164) yielding multiple organisms. 42% of cultures were positive (69/164). There were 52 bacterial organisms, 16 fungal organisms and 7 parasitic organisms recovered. All isolates were examined by our ocular microbiologist, who was able to correctly identify 12% (9/75) of organisms with gram and giemsa staining alone. Conclusions. The ocular microbiologist remains an important consultant for the proper diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis. The low diagnostic yield of gram and giemsa staining suggest that smears alone are not sufficient. As ophthalmologists, we should concentrate our efforts on better specimen collection and organism identification.

AB - Purpose. With the advent of readily available broad spectrum topical antibiotics, ophthalmologists may be less inclined to perform corneal smears and cultures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic capability and utilization of a university-based ocular microbiology laboratory. Methods. A retrospective review was performed examining 164 consecutive corneal cultures performed on patients with visually threatening keratitis submitted to our ocular microbiology laboratory from October 1994 through October 1995. Results. Seventy-five isolates were obtained with 6% of eyes (10/164) yielding multiple organisms. 42% of cultures were positive (69/164). There were 52 bacterial organisms, 16 fungal organisms and 7 parasitic organisms recovered. All isolates were examined by our ocular microbiologist, who was able to correctly identify 12% (9/75) of organisms with gram and giemsa staining alone. Conclusions. The ocular microbiologist remains an important consultant for the proper diagnosis of visually threatening keratitis. The low diagnostic yield of gram and giemsa staining suggest that smears alone are not sufficient. As ophthalmologists, we should concentrate our efforts on better specimen collection and organism identification.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750156758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750156758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 3

ER -