Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system

Peter S. Roland, Angela G. Shoup, M. Coyle Shea, Hyla S. Richey, D. Betty Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Partially implantable hearing devices have been developed to address some of the user-perceived shortcomings of standard amplification systems. Partially implantable devices are purported to provide improved sound quality as a result of decreased occlusion, decreased feedback, and enhanced clarity resulting from increased high-frequency gain. Such improvements may result in greater user satisfaction. To justify selection of a partially implantable device and undergoing a minor surgical procedure, verification techniques must be used to document user improvement or increased satisfaction over conventional amplification. Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction with the SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. Study Design: Within-subjects repeated measures design. Methods: Objective and subjective evaluation pre- and post-implantation with the SOUNDTEC device. Verification techniques included tonal functional gain measures with traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device, word recognition in quiet (NU-6) and in noise (SPIN), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hough Ear Institute Profile (HEIP). Results: Although there was no significant difference between optimal traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device for speech perception measures, the SOUNDTEC device yielded statistically significant increased high-frequency functional gain. Subjective reports indicated that the SOUNDTEC device provides a cleaner, more natural sound without feedback than traditional amplification. Conclusions: Partially implantable hearing aids may address some of the limitations of traditional amplification systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1682-1686
Number of pages5
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume111
Issue number10
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Hearing
Equipment and Supplies
Minor Surgical Procedures
Speech Perception
Patient Satisfaction
Ear
Noise

Keywords

  • Amplification
  • Hearing aids
  • Implantable hearing aids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. / Roland, Peter S.; Shoup, Angela G.; Shea, M. Coyle; Richey, Hyla S.; Jones, D. Betty.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 111, No. 10, 2001, p. 1682-1686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roland, Peter S. ; Shoup, Angela G. ; Shea, M. Coyle ; Richey, Hyla S. ; Jones, D. Betty. / Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. In: Laryngoscope. 2001 ; Vol. 111, No. 10. pp. 1682-1686.
@article{3f9b7554adca433db1908b1381f78c5e,
title = "Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system",
abstract = "Introduction: Partially implantable hearing devices have been developed to address some of the user-perceived shortcomings of standard amplification systems. Partially implantable devices are purported to provide improved sound quality as a result of decreased occlusion, decreased feedback, and enhanced clarity resulting from increased high-frequency gain. Such improvements may result in greater user satisfaction. To justify selection of a partially implantable device and undergoing a minor surgical procedure, verification techniques must be used to document user improvement or increased satisfaction over conventional amplification. Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction with the SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. Study Design: Within-subjects repeated measures design. Methods: Objective and subjective evaluation pre- and post-implantation with the SOUNDTEC device. Verification techniques included tonal functional gain measures with traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device, word recognition in quiet (NU-6) and in noise (SPIN), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hough Ear Institute Profile (HEIP). Results: Although there was no significant difference between optimal traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device for speech perception measures, the SOUNDTEC device yielded statistically significant increased high-frequency functional gain. Subjective reports indicated that the SOUNDTEC device provides a cleaner, more natural sound without feedback than traditional amplification. Conclusions: Partially implantable hearing aids may address some of the limitations of traditional amplification systems.",
keywords = "Amplification, Hearing aids, Implantable hearing aids",
author = "Roland, {Peter S.} and Shoup, {Angela G.} and Shea, {M. Coyle} and Richey, {Hyla S.} and Jones, {D. Betty}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "111",
pages = "1682--1686",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Verification of improved patient outcomes with a partially implantable hearing aid, The SOUNDTEC direct hearing system

AU - Roland, Peter S.

AU - Shoup, Angela G.

AU - Shea, M. Coyle

AU - Richey, Hyla S.

AU - Jones, D. Betty

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Introduction: Partially implantable hearing devices have been developed to address some of the user-perceived shortcomings of standard amplification systems. Partially implantable devices are purported to provide improved sound quality as a result of decreased occlusion, decreased feedback, and enhanced clarity resulting from increased high-frequency gain. Such improvements may result in greater user satisfaction. To justify selection of a partially implantable device and undergoing a minor surgical procedure, verification techniques must be used to document user improvement or increased satisfaction over conventional amplification. Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction with the SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. Study Design: Within-subjects repeated measures design. Methods: Objective and subjective evaluation pre- and post-implantation with the SOUNDTEC device. Verification techniques included tonal functional gain measures with traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device, word recognition in quiet (NU-6) and in noise (SPIN), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hough Ear Institute Profile (HEIP). Results: Although there was no significant difference between optimal traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device for speech perception measures, the SOUNDTEC device yielded statistically significant increased high-frequency functional gain. Subjective reports indicated that the SOUNDTEC device provides a cleaner, more natural sound without feedback than traditional amplification. Conclusions: Partially implantable hearing aids may address some of the limitations of traditional amplification systems.

AB - Introduction: Partially implantable hearing devices have been developed to address some of the user-perceived shortcomings of standard amplification systems. Partially implantable devices are purported to provide improved sound quality as a result of decreased occlusion, decreased feedback, and enhanced clarity resulting from increased high-frequency gain. Such improvements may result in greater user satisfaction. To justify selection of a partially implantable device and undergoing a minor surgical procedure, verification techniques must be used to document user improvement or increased satisfaction over conventional amplification. Objective: To evaluate patient satisfaction with the SOUNDTEC direct hearing system. Study Design: Within-subjects repeated measures design. Methods: Objective and subjective evaluation pre- and post-implantation with the SOUNDTEC device. Verification techniques included tonal functional gain measures with traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device, word recognition in quiet (NU-6) and in noise (SPIN), the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hough Ear Institute Profile (HEIP). Results: Although there was no significant difference between optimal traditional amplification and the SOUNDTEC device for speech perception measures, the SOUNDTEC device yielded statistically significant increased high-frequency functional gain. Subjective reports indicated that the SOUNDTEC device provides a cleaner, more natural sound without feedback than traditional amplification. Conclusions: Partially implantable hearing aids may address some of the limitations of traditional amplification systems.

KW - Amplification

KW - Hearing aids

KW - Implantable hearing aids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034798981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034798981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 1682

EP - 1686

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 10

ER -