Volume assessment of the normal female cervix with MR imaging: Comparison of the segmentation technique and two geometric formulas

Huseyin Dumanli, Julia R. Fielding, David T. Gering, Ron Kikinis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of the normal female cervix and to determine the geometric formula that yields the best estimate. Materials and Methods. Magnetic resonance images of the pelvis in 30 young women were reviewed retrospectively. The volume of the cervix was estimated by using the formulas for an ellipse and a cylinder. Manual labeling and segmentation of the cervix were also performed, and the volume was calculated on the basis of the number and size of the voxels. Comparison of these methods was then performed by using a two-tailed Student t test. Results. No statistically significant difference was found (P = .7) between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique (25.3 mL) and that estimated with the formula for a cylinder (24.8 mL). A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was found between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique and that estimated with the formula for an ellipse (16.4 mL). Conclusion. The normal volume of the cervix in this population of young women was approximately 25 mL. The volume of the cervix should be estimated with the formula for a cylinder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-505
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Cervix Uteri
Pelvis
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Students
Population

Keywords

  • Cervix
  • MR imaging
  • Segmentation
  • Volumetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Volume assessment of the normal female cervix with MR imaging : Comparison of the segmentation technique and two geometric formulas. / Dumanli, Huseyin; Fielding, Julia R.; Gering, David T.; Kikinis, Ron.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 7, No. 7, 01.01.2000, p. 502-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{87326036b7eb4573ae4bdf1e077ec86a,
title = "Volume assessment of the normal female cervix with MR imaging: Comparison of the segmentation technique and two geometric formulas",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of the normal female cervix and to determine the geometric formula that yields the best estimate. Materials and Methods. Magnetic resonance images of the pelvis in 30 young women were reviewed retrospectively. The volume of the cervix was estimated by using the formulas for an ellipse and a cylinder. Manual labeling and segmentation of the cervix were also performed, and the volume was calculated on the basis of the number and size of the voxels. Comparison of these methods was then performed by using a two-tailed Student t test. Results. No statistically significant difference was found (P = .7) between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique (25.3 mL) and that estimated with the formula for a cylinder (24.8 mL). A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was found between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique and that estimated with the formula for an ellipse (16.4 mL). Conclusion. The normal volume of the cervix in this population of young women was approximately 25 mL. The volume of the cervix should be estimated with the formula for a cylinder.",
keywords = "Cervix, MR imaging, Segmentation, Volumetry",
author = "Huseyin Dumanli and Fielding, {Julia R.} and Gering, {David T.} and Ron Kikinis",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80322-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "502--505",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Volume assessment of the normal female cervix with MR imaging

T2 - Comparison of the segmentation technique and two geometric formulas

AU - Dumanli, Huseyin

AU - Fielding, Julia R.

AU - Gering, David T.

AU - Kikinis, Ron

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of the normal female cervix and to determine the geometric formula that yields the best estimate. Materials and Methods. Magnetic resonance images of the pelvis in 30 young women were reviewed retrospectively. The volume of the cervix was estimated by using the formulas for an ellipse and a cylinder. Manual labeling and segmentation of the cervix were also performed, and the volume was calculated on the basis of the number and size of the voxels. Comparison of these methods was then performed by using a two-tailed Student t test. Results. No statistically significant difference was found (P = .7) between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique (25.3 mL) and that estimated with the formula for a cylinder (24.8 mL). A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was found between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique and that estimated with the formula for an ellipse (16.4 mL). Conclusion. The normal volume of the cervix in this population of young women was approximately 25 mL. The volume of the cervix should be estimated with the formula for a cylinder.

AB - Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the volume of the normal female cervix and to determine the geometric formula that yields the best estimate. Materials and Methods. Magnetic resonance images of the pelvis in 30 young women were reviewed retrospectively. The volume of the cervix was estimated by using the formulas for an ellipse and a cylinder. Manual labeling and segmentation of the cervix were also performed, and the volume was calculated on the basis of the number and size of the voxels. Comparison of these methods was then performed by using a two-tailed Student t test. Results. No statistically significant difference was found (P = .7) between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique (25.3 mL) and that estimated with the formula for a cylinder (24.8 mL). A statistically significant difference (P < .05) was found between the volume calculated with the segmentation technique and that estimated with the formula for an ellipse (16.4 mL). Conclusion. The normal volume of the cervix in this population of young women was approximately 25 mL. The volume of the cervix should be estimated with the formula for a cylinder.

KW - Cervix

KW - MR imaging

KW - Segmentation

KW - Volumetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033921963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033921963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80322-0

DO - 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80322-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 10902958

AN - SCOPUS:0033921963

VL - 7

SP - 502

EP - 505

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 7

ER -