What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?

Stuart G. Silverman, John R. Leyendecker, E. Stephen Amis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

161 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Technologic advances in both computed tomographv (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have resulted in the abilily to image the urinary tract in ways that surpass the prior manistay of urinary tract imaging, the intravenous urogram. In. adults, for most, if not all, historical indications for intravenous urography, CT urography or MR urography is now the preferred examination. Although a variety of techniques for both examinations have been descrihed. each test provides more diagnostic information than does intravenous urography.with the introduction of multidetector technology.CT urography. to date, has emerged as the initial heir apparent to intravenous urography; many years of experience have now clearly demonstrated that CT is the test of' choice for many urologic prohlems. including urolithiasis, renal masses, urinary tract infection, trauma, and obstructive uropathy. CT urography provides a detailed anatomic depiction of each of the major portions of the urinary tract-the kidneys, intrarenal collecting systems, ureters, and bladder-and thus allows patients wilh hematuria to be evaluated comprehensively. MR urography can be used also to evaluate the urinary tract and has the advantage of not using ionizing radiation and the potential to provide more functional information than CT. However, MR urography is less estahlished and less reliably results in diagnostic image quality relative to CT urography. Although both tests can be used to evaluate the urinary tract, several issues remain and include reaching a consensus on the optimal protocols and appropriate utilization in an era of cost containment and heightened concerns about radiation exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-323
Number of pages15
JournalRadiology
Volume250
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Urography
Urinary Tract
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Kidney
Urolithiasis
Cost Control
Hematuria
Ureter
Ionizing Radiation
Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary Bladder
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract? / Silverman, Stuart G.; Leyendecker, John R.; Amis, E. Stephen.

In: Radiology, Vol. 250, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 309-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Silverman, Stuart G. ; Leyendecker, John R. ; Amis, E. Stephen. / What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?. In: Radiology. 2009 ; Vol. 250, No. 2. pp. 309-323.
@article{a7aae1dd61a040a6aca1e872c486e15f,
title = "What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?",
abstract = "Technologic advances in both computed tomographv (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have resulted in the abilily to image the urinary tract in ways that surpass the prior manistay of urinary tract imaging, the intravenous urogram. In. adults, for most, if not all, historical indications for intravenous urography, CT urography or MR urography is now the preferred examination. Although a variety of techniques for both examinations have been descrihed. each test provides more diagnostic information than does intravenous urography.with the introduction of multidetector technology.CT urography. to date, has emerged as the initial heir apparent to intravenous urography; many years of experience have now clearly demonstrated that CT is the test of' choice for many urologic prohlems. including urolithiasis, renal masses, urinary tract infection, trauma, and obstructive uropathy. CT urography provides a detailed anatomic depiction of each of the major portions of the urinary tract-the kidneys, intrarenal collecting systems, ureters, and bladder-and thus allows patients wilh hematuria to be evaluated comprehensively. MR urography can be used also to evaluate the urinary tract and has the advantage of not using ionizing radiation and the potential to provide more functional information than CT. However, MR urography is less estahlished and less reliably results in diagnostic image quality relative to CT urography. Although both tests can be used to evaluate the urinary tract, several issues remain and include reaching a consensus on the optimal protocols and appropriate utilization in an era of cost containment and heightened concerns about radiation exposure.",
author = "Silverman, {Stuart G.} and Leyendecker, {John R.} and Amis, {E. Stephen}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2502080534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "250",
pages = "309--323",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the current role of CT urography and MR urography in the evaluation of the urinary tract?

AU - Silverman, Stuart G.

AU - Leyendecker, John R.

AU - Amis, E. Stephen

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Technologic advances in both computed tomographv (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have resulted in the abilily to image the urinary tract in ways that surpass the prior manistay of urinary tract imaging, the intravenous urogram. In. adults, for most, if not all, historical indications for intravenous urography, CT urography or MR urography is now the preferred examination. Although a variety of techniques for both examinations have been descrihed. each test provides more diagnostic information than does intravenous urography.with the introduction of multidetector technology.CT urography. to date, has emerged as the initial heir apparent to intravenous urography; many years of experience have now clearly demonstrated that CT is the test of' choice for many urologic prohlems. including urolithiasis, renal masses, urinary tract infection, trauma, and obstructive uropathy. CT urography provides a detailed anatomic depiction of each of the major portions of the urinary tract-the kidneys, intrarenal collecting systems, ureters, and bladder-and thus allows patients wilh hematuria to be evaluated comprehensively. MR urography can be used also to evaluate the urinary tract and has the advantage of not using ionizing radiation and the potential to provide more functional information than CT. However, MR urography is less estahlished and less reliably results in diagnostic image quality relative to CT urography. Although both tests can be used to evaluate the urinary tract, several issues remain and include reaching a consensus on the optimal protocols and appropriate utilization in an era of cost containment and heightened concerns about radiation exposure.

AB - Technologic advances in both computed tomographv (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have resulted in the abilily to image the urinary tract in ways that surpass the prior manistay of urinary tract imaging, the intravenous urogram. In. adults, for most, if not all, historical indications for intravenous urography, CT urography or MR urography is now the preferred examination. Although a variety of techniques for both examinations have been descrihed. each test provides more diagnostic information than does intravenous urography.with the introduction of multidetector technology.CT urography. to date, has emerged as the initial heir apparent to intravenous urography; many years of experience have now clearly demonstrated that CT is the test of' choice for many urologic prohlems. including urolithiasis, renal masses, urinary tract infection, trauma, and obstructive uropathy. CT urography provides a detailed anatomic depiction of each of the major portions of the urinary tract-the kidneys, intrarenal collecting systems, ureters, and bladder-and thus allows patients wilh hematuria to be evaluated comprehensively. MR urography can be used also to evaluate the urinary tract and has the advantage of not using ionizing radiation and the potential to provide more functional information than CT. However, MR urography is less estahlished and less reliably results in diagnostic image quality relative to CT urography. Although both tests can be used to evaluate the urinary tract, several issues remain and include reaching a consensus on the optimal protocols and appropriate utilization in an era of cost containment and heightened concerns about radiation exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61749093143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61749093143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2502080534

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2502080534

M3 - Article

VL - 250

SP - 309

EP - 323

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -