YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease

Akshay Sood, Sasmit Sarangi, Ambarish Pandey, Karthik Murugiah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To look into effective use of popular Internet site YouTube as an information source on kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions, accounting for significant morbidity, however adequate education regarding simple lifestyle modifications and early recognition of symptoms can reduce recurrence and visits to emergency department. Materials and Methods YouTube was searched using Keywords "nephrolithiasis"; "renal calculi"; "renal stones"; and "kidney stones" for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in English were included. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful; misleading; or personal experiences. The kappa-statistic was used to measure inter-observer variability. Total-viewership; duration; rating; days since upload; source; and information content were noted Results One-hundred ninety-nine videos had relevant information about nephrolithiasis; 58.3% of the videos had useful information and 18.1% were misleading. Useful videos had 47.2% of total viewership (i.e. total no. of views) share, whereas misleading videos had 2.8%, with statistically significant difference in viewership/day and rating among useful videos vs misleading videos. Universities'channel videos provided the best overall information coverage among the useful videos (prevention = 100%, symptoms = 80%, treatments = 60%, other information = 80%). No significant difference was seen in viewership/day or rating of useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. Conclusions YouTube has a substantial amount of information on urolithiasis. Therefore, consumer-generated outlets such as YouTube have significant potential to sway individuals' attitudes both for and against the right choice. In view of this, authoritative videos by trusted sources should be posted for dissemination of reliable information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-562
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kidney Calculi
Kidney Diseases
Nephrolithiasis
Urolithiasis
Observer Variation
Information Dissemination
Internet
Life Style
Hospital Emergency Service
Morbidity
Physicians
Kidney
Education
Recurrence
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. / Sood, Akshay; Sarangi, Sasmit; Pandey, Ambarish; Murugiah, Karthik.

In: Urology, Vol. 77, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 558-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sood, Akshay ; Sarangi, Sasmit ; Pandey, Ambarish ; Murugiah, Karthik. / YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. In: Urology. 2011 ; Vol. 77, No. 3. pp. 558-562.
@article{e86af2cb1efb42198b8495f757a319dd,
title = "YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease",
abstract = "Objective To look into effective use of popular Internet site YouTube as an information source on kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions, accounting for significant morbidity, however adequate education regarding simple lifestyle modifications and early recognition of symptoms can reduce recurrence and visits to emergency department. Materials and Methods YouTube was searched using Keywords {"}nephrolithiasis{"}; {"}renal calculi{"}; {"}renal stones{"}; and {"}kidney stones{"} for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in English were included. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful; misleading; or personal experiences. The kappa-statistic was used to measure inter-observer variability. Total-viewership; duration; rating; days since upload; source; and information content were noted Results One-hundred ninety-nine videos had relevant information about nephrolithiasis; 58.3{\%} of the videos had useful information and 18.1{\%} were misleading. Useful videos had 47.2{\%} of total viewership (i.e. total no. of views) share, whereas misleading videos had 2.8{\%}, with statistically significant difference in viewership/day and rating among useful videos vs misleading videos. Universities'channel videos provided the best overall information coverage among the useful videos (prevention = 100{\%}, symptoms = 80{\%}, treatments = 60{\%}, other information = 80{\%}). No significant difference was seen in viewership/day or rating of useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. Conclusions YouTube has a substantial amount of information on urolithiasis. Therefore, consumer-generated outlets such as YouTube have significant potential to sway individuals' attitudes both for and against the right choice. In view of this, authoritative videos by trusted sources should be posted for dissemination of reliable information.",
author = "Akshay Sood and Sasmit Sarangi and Ambarish Pandey and Karthik Murugiah",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "558--562",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease

AU - Sood, Akshay

AU - Sarangi, Sasmit

AU - Pandey, Ambarish

AU - Murugiah, Karthik

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Objective To look into effective use of popular Internet site YouTube as an information source on kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions, accounting for significant morbidity, however adequate education regarding simple lifestyle modifications and early recognition of symptoms can reduce recurrence and visits to emergency department. Materials and Methods YouTube was searched using Keywords "nephrolithiasis"; "renal calculi"; "renal stones"; and "kidney stones" for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in English were included. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful; misleading; or personal experiences. The kappa-statistic was used to measure inter-observer variability. Total-viewership; duration; rating; days since upload; source; and information content were noted Results One-hundred ninety-nine videos had relevant information about nephrolithiasis; 58.3% of the videos had useful information and 18.1% were misleading. Useful videos had 47.2% of total viewership (i.e. total no. of views) share, whereas misleading videos had 2.8%, with statistically significant difference in viewership/day and rating among useful videos vs misleading videos. Universities'channel videos provided the best overall information coverage among the useful videos (prevention = 100%, symptoms = 80%, treatments = 60%, other information = 80%). No significant difference was seen in viewership/day or rating of useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. Conclusions YouTube has a substantial amount of information on urolithiasis. Therefore, consumer-generated outlets such as YouTube have significant potential to sway individuals' attitudes both for and against the right choice. In view of this, authoritative videos by trusted sources should be posted for dissemination of reliable information.

AB - Objective To look into effective use of popular Internet site YouTube as an information source on kidney stone disease. Urolithiasis is among the most common urological conditions, accounting for significant morbidity, however adequate education regarding simple lifestyle modifications and early recognition of symptoms can reduce recurrence and visits to emergency department. Materials and Methods YouTube was searched using Keywords "nephrolithiasis"; "renal calculi"; "renal stones"; and "kidney stones" for videos uploaded containing relevant information about the disease. Only videos in English were included. Two physician viewers watched each video and classified them as useful; misleading; or personal experiences. The kappa-statistic was used to measure inter-observer variability. Total-viewership; duration; rating; days since upload; source; and information content were noted Results One-hundred ninety-nine videos had relevant information about nephrolithiasis; 58.3% of the videos had useful information and 18.1% were misleading. Useful videos had 47.2% of total viewership (i.e. total no. of views) share, whereas misleading videos had 2.8%, with statistically significant difference in viewership/day and rating among useful videos vs misleading videos. Universities'channel videos provided the best overall information coverage among the useful videos (prevention = 100%, symptoms = 80%, treatments = 60%, other information = 80%). No significant difference was seen in viewership/day or rating of useful videos based on the kind of information they contained. Conclusions YouTube has a substantial amount of information on urolithiasis. Therefore, consumer-generated outlets such as YouTube have significant potential to sway individuals' attitudes both for and against the right choice. In view of this, authoritative videos by trusted sources should be posted for dissemination of reliable information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952359784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952359784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.536

M3 - Article

C2 - 21131027

AN - SCOPUS:79952359784

VL - 77

SP - 558

EP - 562

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -